1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ymorist [56]
4 years ago
14

Why did the British change their support in favor of the Jews?

History
2 answers:
klasskru [66]4 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The British changed their support in favor of the Jews because the British government though strategically and realized that a loyal ally in the Middle East region could be of many benefits for England.

Knowing that the Jewish people are wealthy, they supported them to establish Israel in the Palestinian territories with the support of the United States. This decision caused so much anger to Palestinians and has been the reason for many conflicts and wars in the Middle East region.

sergiy2304 [10]4 years ago
4 0
Basically, Jews Britain change its support in favor of Jews because they wanted to give some of Palestine's territory to them.
If the Jews occupy the majority of that territory, it will be easier for the Britain if they wanted to expand their democratic influence towards the Middle East Region.
You might be interested in
How can effectivr state laws best support a fair election process? A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registrati
solniwko [45]

Answer:

A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places

Explanation:

It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.

It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is most likely to have made this statement? robert owen adam smith charles fourier karl marx
topjm [15]
I searched for the statement that you specified on the Internet and I find out that the famous personality that said the speech is Karl Marx. Karl Marx an ideological thinking called "Marxism." I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
where did gandhi write On The Eve Of Historic Dandi March? and what does the time and place have to do with the meaning?
Evgen [1.6K]
Hope these may help , pictures from my history book

3 0
3 years ago
What was planned and built to help people travel East-West across the territories?
goldfiish [28.3K]
The Cumberland Road made transportation to the West easier for new settlers. The Erie Canal facilitated trade with the West by connecting the Hudson River to Lake Erie. Railroads shortened transportation times throughout the country, making it easier and less expensive to move people and goods.



Hope this helps :)
8 0
3 years ago
How many people were killed in world war 1
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

Around 22 million deaths

Explanation:

The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I is estimated to be about 40 million: estimates range from 20.5 to 22 million deaths and about 20 to 22 million wounded military personnel, ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 15. Despite the problems that followed industrialization, the Industrial Revolution had a number of
    5·1 answer
  • Why are there no photos of Lincoln giving the Gettysburg Address?
    9·1 answer
  • How old was malcolm x when he was assassinated
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes "Rip Van Winkle"?
    14·2 answers
  • By 1850, how many blacks were slaves in the United States?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Soviet Union and the United States have to decrease military spending?
    12·1 answer
  • . How did Japanese leaders respond to the interactions with the United States and European
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements describes how dynasties following the Zhou used the Mandate of Heaven?PLEASE HELP I WILL NAME
    12·2 answers
  • What kind of people was with the democratic party
    15·1 answer
  • How does Apollo’s entrance into the ring portray American culture?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!