1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?

History
1 answer:
Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

You might be interested in
At the end of the French and Indian War in 1763, the British government maintained a national debt in excess of 122 million poun
sleet_krkn [62]
D. Trade with France occurred
3 0
3 years ago
Does spatial inequality exist in Ecuador ?
allochka39001 [22]
Not sure but I think
3 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLZZ. WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!Describe the role the railroad played in the urbanization of Texas.
sveta [45]

Answer

look down

Explanation:

The era of cotton, cattle and railroads in the late 19th century was a time of huge economic growth for Texas. Railroads brought rapid expansion of people, business, and cities across the state. ... Ranching wasn't the only industry with a major impact on the Texas economy during the late 1800s.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need an answer quick please help
BlackZzzverrR [31]
They happened in this order Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, Ionian Revolt. Hope this helps.
3 0
3 years ago
What pressures ended the rule of Tsar Nicholas II
raketka [301]

Answer:

The kind of pressures ended the rule of Tsar Nicholas II is fighting in World War I, over the years of injustice, toppled the rule of Tsar Nicholas II, and he was replaced by Provisional Government to continue in the war.

Explanation:

Hope this helped!!!

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on what you just saw, what made Roger Sherman unique?
    6·2 answers
  • The apparent winner of the election of 1876, with 203 electoral college votes and a quarter of a million more popular votes than
    5·1 answer
  • What do seismologists do?
    13·1 answer
  • After the civil war, which side helped others with reconstruction
    9·1 answer
  • i need information and notable and about barack obama
    6·2 answers
  • What 2 states have proportional representation in the election
    7·1 answer
  • Describe what happen to Britain's finances as a of the french and Indian war
    14·1 answer
  • 6. Which of the following Enlightenment philosophers focused on civil liberties?<br> (4 Points)
    10·1 answer
  • What is coins (in history)​
    10·2 answers
  • Ill give brainly but please hurry
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!