It increased federal intervention in the affairs of the independent states
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The section "The atomic bomb: A controversial weapon" contributed to the development of ideas in the text in the following way.
In this section of the article, the author writes that even today, historians and scholars still debate the idea of if launching the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a good idea of President Harry Truman or not. Some say that using the atomic bomb helped to end the war quickly, but other scholars said that the bomb killed so many people and left too much destruction.
The title of the article is "The Bombing of Hiroshima," and was written by author Jessica McBirney in 2017.
Answer:
The delegates for a strong national government believed that a strong national government would endanger the rights of states. The delegates for stronger state governments believed that a strong national government would threaten individual liberty.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
brainlest plzz
The Marshall Plan rebuilt European countries' economies after the devasation of World War II.
Explanation/context:
The "Marshall Plan" was named after the man who then was US Secretary of State, George C. Marshall. Officially the plan was called the European Recovery Program. Marshall announced the plan in 1947, and it went into effect in 1948. The intent was to provide aid and rebuilding to European economies after the damaging effects of World War II. Eastern bloc countries, however, rejected the plan, so it ended up as a plan that benefited Western European nations and not Eastern European nations.
In his speech introducing the plan, Secretary Marshall had said: "Our policy is not directed against any country, but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Any government that is willing to assist in recovery will find full co-operation on the part of the United States. Its purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist."
The view in the communist-controlled Eastern bloc was that the US was trying to use such a policy to spread its influence and threaten their patterns of government under communism. So the plan ended up building allies for the US in Western Europe, while the Eastern European countries sided with the Soviet Union.
