1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
3 years ago
7

What was Bryan's opinion of the gold standard?

History
2 answers:
Sindrei [870]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: he was in favor of using both gold and silver for American currency

Explanation:

Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer is:

B - He was in favor of using both gold and silver for American currency.

Explanation:

I did the assignment.

You might be interested in
Who was the Virginia Declaration of Rights written by?
Tanzania [10]
It was written by George mason
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Marble cake federalism can best be described by which of the following statements?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Cooperative federalism, also known as marble-cake federalism, is defined as a flexible relationship between the federal and state governments in which both work together on a variety of issues and programs.

Marble Cake Federalism is a form of federalism where there is mixing of powers, resources, and programs between and among the national, state, and local governments. ... In marble cake federalism there will be an intermingling of all levels of government in policies and programming.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Name the Central Powers country and the Allied country that spent the most money on the war. Allied: Russia; Central Powers: Ger
In-s [12.5K]

The correct answer is:  

Allied: the United Kingdom; Central Powers: Germany.  

The Allies had a lot more potential wealth to be spent on WW1. It has been estimated that the Allies spent $147 billion on the war while the Central Powers invested only $61 billion. Britain and its Empire on the Allies side spent $47 billion while Germany spent $45 billion.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
Lady bird [3.3K]

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 


The preamble to the Declaration states:


<span>
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government …</span>

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.


Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.


Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.


The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.


When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which company paid for the settling of Virginia?
dsp73

Answer:

C. London Company :)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the first primeminster of pakistan
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a factor in the United States dominating the world economy after World War II?
    14·1 answer
  • The enumeration listing in the constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
    15·1 answer
  • Is Charles David Waller in WW1
    11·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    8·2 answers
  • In one paragraph, compare life in the Roman Republic with life in the Roman Empire. Include specific examples that explain how l
    8·2 answers
  • According to the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution, how long may a president serve?
    7·2 answers
  • Select all that apply. What were main points of the Progressive Era
    11·1 answer
  • Would you ever consider going on a strike to defend your rights, even if it meant losing your job? Explain your reasoning.​
    9·2 answers
  • Which new inventions were taking place?​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!