"But assuming that national identities will persist, can a European identity be built alongside them or over them? Is there such
an identity, and if not, is it desirable? Is there, or can there be, such a thing as European patriotism?" -Leszek Kolakowski, "Can Europe Happen?" The new Criterion, May 2003
Based on this excerpt, what is the main challenge to the formation of a European identity? A. the reduction in cultural diversity among European people B. from the doubt over whether national identities should persist to the doubt over whether European identities should persist C. the ongoing growth of European patriotism D. the existence of national identities within Europe
The answer would be letter d. European identity can be understood, not as an individuality that is outside or anti-national, but as an internal change of national identities. In these terms, it is not a circumstance of European versus national identities, but of the Europeanization of national identities that is important. Therefore it is the circumstance that many national identities have originate within the scheme of European integration.
The first event that brought Dr Martin Luther King was his 'I have a Dream' Speech. This allowed everyone to see how he was campaigning for Civil rights. His speech was held on 28th august 1963. Hope this helps :)
The Philippines has become one of the victims of colonialism as European powers compete for power and glory. Filipinos does not agree that their own land to be ruled by foreigners, which are the Spaniards, therefore revolutions were widespread throughout the archipelago at that time.
The Confederacy had much better leadership than the Union. The Union made the most of all of their natural resources, which they had a lot of. They had a large manufacturing industry, meaning they could produce new equipment and technology, including the railroad system.
