The fifth amendment protection against the deprivation of life liberty or property without due process
Explanation:
This rule is grounded in the fifth amendment in the Bill of Rights and this rule governs in protecting the people against illegal seizures and searches and this law also intends the people to protect them of being executed from the prosecutors
This is also formulated to protect the judiciary rights and it states that no person shall be deprived of life,liberty or property without the due process of law and they cannot be compelled in any criminal cases to be witness against themselves
Answer: Their journey became known as<u> the "Trail of Tears."</u>
Explanation/context:
In the court case, <em>Worcester v. Georgia</em> (1832), Samuel Worcester was a Christian minister working among the Cherokee and was supportive of the Cherokee cause. To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government. Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision. The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights."
President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision. He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate." He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate. This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.
Yes. Not all slaves practiced religion but the others accepted Christianity
I believe it's because the British Empire inconsistent treatment.
At first, British empire treated the colonists fairly and both of them developed a mutually beneficial relationship with one another.
After 1763, the British Empire issued a regulation that banned the Colonists to issue their own paper money, which make it realy hard for the colonists to pay off their debt.
