1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxTIMURxx [149]
3 years ago
6

4. The number of senators would increase only if ?

History
1 answer:
Phoenix [80]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The right answer is:

1 If another state joined the United States.

Explanation:

There are debates even today , as there were in the late 18th century, on the size, composition and other crucial issues relating to the Senate. The US Constitution says simply that "the Senate shall be composed of two senators from each state." If for example, Puerto Rico decided to join the Union as the 51st state of the USA, then the Senate would have to be enlarged with two senators who´d represent Puerto Rico. But of course, if there was a bipartisan agreement, there could be an amendment to increase the number of senators, too.

You might be interested in
in the text the author discusses some of the ways the first amendment has been interpreted. in the context of our current americ
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

This question is really geared more towards your own interpretation, so there isn't necessarily going to be a right or wrong answer. I would say that today the first amendment protects when people are speaking out against policies and general injustices in the American society today, and for instance, on social media I have seen people say "f trump and f america." The first amendment is protecting them, so that nobody can hold that statement against them and press charges. If we lived in russia, the russian secret police would find you, and kill you for that. Personally, I believe that if someone wanted to burn an american flag on their front lawn, and curse america, they should not be protected by the first amendment. that should be a crime. However, the first amendment does protect them, so there is nothing anyone could do about that legally.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What historical conflict was an example of a disagreement between state and federal government?
sveta [45]

The answer is c. Civil War. The states of the South were against any interference from the Federal government particularly on the issue of slavery.  When Lincoln was elected, the Southern states felt that their rights to own slaves would be jeopardized and this would lead to Civil War.

5 0
3 years ago
In the late 19th century, this political and social movement swept through the United States, its followers believing that all p
KiRa [710]

Answer:

In the late 19th century, "Nativism" as a political and social movement swept through the United States. its followers believed that all people who were not born in the U.S. and were of European heritage should be banned from the country.

Explanation:

In the nineteenth century the number of Irish immigrants in the eastern United States grew, and the number of Germans in the Midwest. Irish potato famine and economic instability in Germany caused nearly three million people to reach the United States. Many of these people were Catholic. American Protestants, mainly in urban areas, felt threatened by newcomers. For many, the Catholic Church represented tyranny and subjugation to a foreign power. On a practical level, competition for jobs increased as new workers arrived. As anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic sentiments emerged, nativist groups began to form in cities across the United States.

The best-known nativist movement in the United States emerged in the decades before the Civil War. It was the American Party, better known as Know-Nothings. This movement was a reflection of the difficult times facing society in the nineteenth century. The nation faced the serious conflict over slavery and westward expansion.

This anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States has a history that goes back to the first laws of naturalization. For example, it is important to know that laws were made that established that only those white European immigrants were eligible for naturalization. The nativists of the <em>Know-Nothings</em> movement opposed the entry of German and Irish immigrants in the mid-19th century. In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Law prohibiting Chinese immigration to the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
A control group is not necessary in all experiments. True or false
son4ous [18]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

It is always necessary

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What forces resulted in the emergence of diverse native societies in both north and south america?
garik1379 [7]
I think it's the revolutionary war.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which breed of dog came out first Poodle or German shepherd?
    5·1 answer
  • You want to learn about your congressperson's voting record. Where would you find information on how they voted?
    7·1 answer
  • Should the united states have annexed the philippines?
    8·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast Mrs Frank to Mrs. Van Daan.
    5·1 answer
  • Thanks to the efforts of the number of inventors, the Industrial Revolution began in England textile industry. The flying shuttl
    12·2 answers
  • Which action was not a precedent set by President George Washington?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Treaty of Ghent?
    7·2 answers
  • What is one criticism of presidential primaries?
    14·2 answers
  • Question 2 of 5
    5·1 answer
  • Which detail from the text best explains why many people are wary of using bitcoin?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!