Answer:
In America 1831, there was no sign of slavery ending. Nat Turner, a 31-year-old slave seen as a genius by many, was in belief that he was a prophet, and that it was god’s plan for him to revolt against and kill the whites in order to end slavery. He grouped up with others and created a rebellion that lasted only a few days but ended with the deaths of 55 to 65 men, women, and children. Of the 55 – 65 people that were killed, many were children too. Opinions over the years, decades and centuries vary about Turner. Hero or villain? Savior or scourge? Was he insane? He reportedly had a vision about the rebellion shortly before launching it. Maybe he was ‘mad.’ Slavery might do that to a person. He actually may have been all of the above.
In order to truly understand Nat Turner’s action you have to place yourself into the psychic of a slave in America during the 1400 to 1800s. If one believes that men and women can be used as “beasts”, murdered and raped then one cannot truly offer a perspective. One must understand the series of traumatic events that led up to the uprising. The slave owners had forced African Americans into slavery generations after generations. Tortured and abused men, women and children every single day of their lives, and it was never questioned but when the slaves decided to rebel, they were suddenly “madmen”. If you believed that it is your right to destroy family, whole families, why would you not believe it was your right to destroy a race and put an end to it once and for all?
This may sound slow but I thinks it’s D.
Answer:
The Bible attributes life on earth to supernatural causes;
evolution attributes it to natural processes is your best answer.
Explanation:
The biblical story teaches that there is a, as people would put it, super-natural being, or known as God inside the texts, which created the world and everything that is in it. On the other hand, evolution attributes the "creation" to the big bang, in which nothing somehow becomes something.
~
Demand was high and slaves (especially african slave trade) were easy and cheap to get since tribes would kidnapp other africans in exchange for guns and 'modern' (for their time) items they wanted. In new lands people needed slaves to do a lot of the work they were unable to do.
Answer:
The answer is yes. If the federal government allowed states to do whatever they wished, and the Northern and the Southern states decided they did not need one another, the Civil War would probably not have happened.
