Answer:
I think option B is correct......
Answer:
As the need for more land arose as a result of more farmers and more plantations (to create profit from) the government began to turn a blind eye to the continual pushing of colonists to the natives. During colonial times, it was ok as British limited westward expansion but once it was in the hands of the presidents, it was either to assimilate to US or be driven away. Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act 1830 and the Trail of Tears was the infamous name given to the forced Cherokee tribes away from their home in Georgia (bc of gold discovered a year before).
Answer:
Social constructs are sets of ideas that come about through social interaction. They describe reality but they do not necessarily correspond to anything in the real world.
Social constructionism observes how the interactions of individuals with their society and the world around them gives meaning to otherwise worthless things and creates the reality of the society.
Explanation:
The United States’ approach to foreign policy had not change conceptually from the days it signed its independence. These ideas were primarily based on protecting US interests overseas and restricting foreign influences in the Americas. Once they furthered themselves politically and
economically, they gained the status of being a world power and they still wanted more. They figured they had to strengthen the country industrially as they needed worldwide markets for its growing industrial and agricultural
surpluses as well as sources of raw materials for manufacturing. They could only achieve these foreign markets with more concentrated efforts on its foreign policy as America was principally guided by economic motives.
The internal economic growth of the United States made them want to look outward for foreign markets. Export earnings increased from 450 million to over a billion from 1870 to the early 1890’s. US business’s were soon
overpowering foreign competition as even American steelmakers could easily compete with any British producer in the world. Everything seemed to be inciting the US to expand abroad. Expansionists throughout America emphasized the resources of what other lands could provide and the wealth that could result from their establishment. For example, Cuba offered an abundance of sugar
plantations and land in Panama would offer America control of the canal.
The economic benefits of a foreign land can be seen through an example of Americans exploring the distant islands of Hawaii. During the course of the early 1800s, missionaries from America traversed on a laborious voyage to Hawaii and ended up settling there. They offered accounts of incredible economic opportunities and possibilities in the Hawaiian islands. Consequently, other Americans proceeded to Hawaii to become sugar planters and to establish lucrative businesses.
And search it on internet