All categories

3 years ago

The deprecation method that charges more expenses in earlier years than in later years is

2 answers:

4 0

Double-declining balance. Keep in mind there are three main ways to depreciate: straight-line, units of production, and double declining balance. Straight-line means depreciating the same amount every year. Units of production is based off your production levels for the year. Double declining means you depreciate more in earlier years (2 times your straight-line rate) and depreciate less in later years.

BigorU [14]3 years ago

4 0

You might be interested in

In what situations is top-down planning likely to be superior to bottom-up emergent strategy development

Marianna [84]

Answer is given below :

Explanation:

Both strategies aim to convey and process knowledge between and within the organization. The top-down approach for sub-categories to gain insights at the senior management level breaks down a system.
This is a great tool to help managers identify areas of improvement using quota and monthly matrix goals. There are flaws in this strategy, employees are not involved in the process and managers do not understand the full impact of the changes made.
Morality can be affected because this strategy is motivated by fear and encouragement. The bottom line is that in some cases it is more complex, although employees feel motivated to provide more authority and quality work. The information is processed to a minimum and communicated to management.
This may help in some areas because administrators may not fully understand the process. I should use the military as an example for a top down strategy.
It works on the battlefield when there is no time to discuss or motivate employees. Top down is used when there is a slight change in environmental factors.

5 0

3 years ago

Moe is an average worker stuck on a team of complacent workers. Nick is an innovator who produces triple the amount of the avera

VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

Wyatt

Explanation:

High outcome interpendence is a concept that encourages cooperation between members on a team. It shows that if a team wins all members will benefit, and if the team fails all members will be adversely affected.

In this scenario Wyatt who is a slacker in the team of Nick will stand to gain more.

In a high outcome interpendence scenario Nick will be forced to improve on the performance of Wyatt in order to meet team objectives.

The other average workers will only gain a little from increased cooperation.

5 0

3 years ago

An economy has experienced a rightward shift of its long-run aggregate supply curve and is now producing on that new long-run ag

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

The answer is letter D.

Explanation:

It is reasonable to expect that the cyclical unemployment rate has been unaffected.

4 0

3 years ago

The income tax rate in a state is a flat 10 percent. Based on that rate, who has the higher tax burden?

agasfer [191]

I think it’s Alex since he has the lowest salary so it’d be harder for him to pay the tax

3 0

3 years ago

A company is selling bonds with a face value of $1,000 to raise money for a plant expansion. The bonds pay a coupon rate of 4% p

Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

10.26%

Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-

Net sales = $760

Face value of bonds = $1,000

Coupon rate = 4% = $1,000 × 4 ÷ 100

= 40

N = Number of Years = 5 annually = semiannually = 5 × 2

= 10 years

We assume, interest rate = 10% = 0.10

P = Coupon Rate ÷ 2 × (PVIFA,Interest Rate ÷ 2%,No. of Years) + Future Value(PVIF,Interest Rate ÷ 2%, No. of Years)

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)N] ÷ Interest Rate + Future Value[1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate) × N]

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1-1 ÷ (1 + 0.10 ÷ 2)^10] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1 + 0.10 ÷ 2)^10]

=$20 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1.05)^10] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1.05)^10]

=$20 × [1 -1 ÷ 1.6288946] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ 1.6288946]

= 420 × 7.72173 + $1,000 × 0.613913

= $154.4346 + $613.913

= $768.3476

= $768.35

But the given value is 760, so we assume interest rate = 11%

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1-1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)^N] ÷ Interest Rate + Future Value[1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)^N]

= $40 ÷ 2 × [1 - 1 ÷(1 + 0.11 ÷ 2)^10] ÷ 0.055 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1 + 0.11 ÷ 2)^10]

= $20 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1.055)^10] ÷ 0.055 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1.055)^10]

= $20 × [1 - 1 ÷ 1.70814446] ÷ 0.055 + $1000 × [1 ÷ 1.70814446]

= $20 × 7.5376255 + $1,000 × 0.5854306

= $150.75 + $585.43

= $736.18

At the Interest rate of 10% the price is more than $760 and at the Interest rate of 1% the price is less than $760. So the required rate lies in between 10% to 11%.

So required rate

Yield To Maturity = Lower Interest Rate + (Difference Between Interest Rate) × Higher Price - Received Price ÷ Higher Price - Lower Price

= 1 0+( 11 - 10) × $768.35 - $760 ÷ $768.35 - $736.18

= 10 + 1 × $8.35 ÷ $32.17

= 10 + 0.26

= 10.26%

7 0

3 years ago