Yes that’s true; this happened in Indian Ocean trade
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Indian trade on the ocean has been a major factor in East / West transactions all along with the past of which different trading routes are often known as the Monsoon Market.
In the 1500s, when Portugal conquered and sought to attempted to make its own benefit, Indian Ocean Trade start with small Treaties across 800AD, declining
The intention of Vasco Da Gama was to find a path from Portugal to Europe, Africa and then to India, by sailing across. For several years, European countries have purchased Asian products via other, harder paths.
Vasco da Gama as well as other Europeans, who toured the city-states of the Swahili Mountains, also preserved journals describing both port cities ' wonders— and eventually their brutal devastation by the Portuguese settlers.
So obviously the records of stock transactions made through the Indian Ocean trade network have been stored by African and Asian businesses and governments.
Answer:
The main reason for bringing African Slaves instead of Native slaves from South America or even North America is because, they were susceptible to diseases brought by the Settlers, Africa was already used to these diseases so they were easy to bring. Furthermore, an example of this is the tragic story of Darth Plaguis the wise *AHEM* I mean pocahauntus who was brought to England on a ship but died due to disease on that ship. If one loses 70-80% of their slaves on a ship then its useless. ALSO VERY IMPORTANT your question is supposed to say 12 million not 1/2 million
"<span>(1) status of slavery in the territories and states" is the issue that is reflected in these headlines, and is the main issue that was a problem leading up to the Civil War. </span>
<em>Past paper you can find the question:</em>
<em>October / November 2011 </em>
<em>Here is your answer:</em>
<em />
