The best summary of paragraphs 1-16 is this:
C. Madame Loisel loses her friend's diamond necklace, and her husband goes all over the city to try to find it. Finally, they decide to buy a new necklace to replace the lost one. The new one is expensive. The couple pays half the amount in cash and saves money to pay off the rest.
<h3>
</h3><h3>What is the best summary for the text?</h3>
The best summary for the text is the one that shows the events in the text without inserting any personal opinions. As much as possible, the main ideas are covered in the summary.
Option C aptly describes the events in the text as Madame Loisel and her husband put in a lot of effort to find the diamond necklace.
Learn more about summaries here:
brainly.com/question/24858866
#SPJ1
Hey! The answer your teacher is looking for might be subjective. That said, my response might not be correct even if it's valid.
Characteristics:
* Story presents clear, fast worldbuilding
* Story can convey a comprehensive theme in a short period of time
* Story has a concise narrative without dragging / rushing through key points.
Conflict:
A 2004 book by Christopher Booker lists 7 widely recognized archetypes for storytelling:
Overcoming the Monster
Rags to Riches
The Quest
Voyage and Return
Comedy
Tragedy
Rebirth
I'm gonna assume you can guess the conflict(s) of each archetype based on the names; just choose three of them.
Characters:
This is very subjective, but the most obvious answer is a protagonist, antagonist, and static / flat character (doesn't change throughout the story, serves some kind of supporting role).
Conditions:
Time and place; since it's such a simple answer, your teacher probably wants you to explain how these factors affect character behavior / the progression of a story.
I hope this helped!
wut was the question? i really want to complete my challenge... T-T
its fine tho.. :)
Answer:
B. Word Count
Tone shows purpose, intended audience shows purpose, word choice shows purpose but word count does it.
Explanation:
Answer:
The argument is not sound; the author uses an either-or argument.
Explanation:
"If your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master."
