Question 2

English

1 answer:

MaRussiya [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Walter intentionally gives Travis the money to bother Ruth.

Explanation:

From the scenario, after Ruth refuses to give Travis the money he requests, and Walter doubled it, it seems that Walter wants to annoy Ruth in some way. This is the reason he gives Travis double of the amount he requests. This intentional provocation depicts the unhealthy relationship between Ruth and Walter. As a family, husband and wife should act in unity. They should discuss issues and agree with each other and even include their son in the discussion as part of a teaching moment to educate Travis. Had there been good relationship between Ruth and Walter, perhaps, Ruth would not have refused to give Travis any money. She could have explained to Travis that they had already planned to give him much more than he requested in order to cover his expenses.

You might be interested in

What does ghandi offer viceroy? How might this offer affect the viceroy?

valentina_108 [34]

Excuse me what is an Viceroy?

8 0

3 years ago

lets say a prayer if you report you going to hell Loving God, I pray that you will comfort me in my suffering, lend skill to the

natka813 [3]

Yessss suhhhh Amen ig ✋

6 0

3 years ago

What do the words "a web of gloomy paths with no sure endings" tell the reader about the trail?

Gemiola [76]

The correct answer is B.

The paths are described as a web, meaning there is no one route that seems better than the others. This idea is further echoed by saying there are "no sure endings." It is not clear which path will take them to their destination.

Therefore, this description conveys the idea that there is no clear indication which way the group should go.

7 0

3 years ago

The question of whether or not to allow cell phones in school is an important one. Cell phones are a monumental distraction to y

tatyana61 [14]

The inconsistency is: the writing states that the cell phones are a monumental distraction at school but it encourages its usage at the same time.

According to the text, young peoples' attention should be focused on learning and the phones disturb the process. Therefore, they should be strictly forbidden at school. But there is no point in forbidding them, if using them to communicate with parents is seen as something positive and purposeful. This does not make any sense, this is double standards, the school should either allow the phones at school and not complain about them at all, or it should prohibit their usage without any exceptions such as communicating with parents or taking pictures with friends.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which sentence demonstrates writing in a style and tone that are most appropriate for an audience of professional scientists?

Blizzard [7]

Answer:

A. The results of the experiment showed a quantifiable decrease in oxygen levels.

Explanation:

The chosen sentence possesses a formal register with technical vocabulary related to science, which can be understood by professional scientists. For instance, the words quantifiable and decrease have a more academic style. Besides, the writing is impersonal and written in the third person.

The rest of the options are incorrect because they have contractions and they are too informal. Thus, their vocabulary contain casual expressions which do not follow the conventions of an academic style.

5 0

3 years ago