Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
Answer:
The nation was in mourning, where spectators had estimated to be 17% who watched the event live as the tragedy unfolded. This had compelled remarkable cause, being a space shuttle had crashed as a causation cold weather had caused fault and reacted with the seals in the joints of the technical components of the space-shuttle causing death to five passengers on board.
People overcome with sadness were exposed to grief for a technical problem being so small, that had attributed to five healthy passengers who were taken so unexpectedly. The actual notion of 2nd attempt to relaunch 32 weeks later, was met again with sympathetic tribute towards the family lives this tragedy had impacted. These families had paid tribute to the space shuttle their friends and colleagues had all supported the relaunch 32 weeks later. Speaking of them as passionate and dedicated people, many would see them as role models and such tragedy with loss of life of one of the passengers to be a teacher, was seen as inspirational prior and after the crash. The added notion of her being set to be the first teacher in space, she was representative of all and every education community and for many the ultimate dream. This news of tragedy unfolded injured the hearts of many, 80% of the nation had become aware to the fatal event within the first hour, where loosing combined lives bound for space, was too surreal. Press spoke of the event as an inspirational and one off event opportunity for a female teacher, being space flight. Images of the team preparations on the news leading up to the event were repeated in new tribute, and were done so to juxtapose new image of national grief of what could have been. These images affected every school and community across the country and further field as case study was central to many lessons across the country.
Explanation:
Approximately 17 percent of the American population witnessed the launch on live television broadcast because of the presence of high school teacher Christa McAuliffe, who would have been the first teacher in space. Media coverage of the accident was extensive; one study reported that 85 percent of Americans surveyed had heard the news within an hour of the accident. The Challenger disaster has been used as a case study in many discussions of engineering safety and workplace ethics.
You could maybe take a glance on what president Reagan said.
<span>As you can see, this story is an example of man vs. nature conflict, that's why the state and condition of nature is that important regarding to the character's' mood and behaviour. The textual evidence from “The Interlopers” which supports the conclusion that nature reflects the mood of the characters is a.)"Assuredly there was a disturbing element in the forest, and Ulrich could guess the quarter from whence it came." The nature in this sentence explains character's actions.<span>
</span></span>
There are certain criteria that can be used to evaluate any argument.
1. Summarization 2.identification 3.investigation
<h3>
What are the arguments? </h3>
An argument is a collection of statements, some of which are provided in support of another statement, the conclusion.
When examining someone's argument, use the criteria listed below to aid in your evaluation.
- Compile a summary of the sender's message.
- Examine the evidence that has been supplied.
- Examine the viewpoint.
- Determine the legitimacy
Following are the examples in which argument is evaluated:
Arguments about evaluations are commonplace. You've made several decisions before leaving home in the morning:
You've applied criteria to a specific situation in each scenario and then made a judgment.
Learn more about Arguments:
brainly.com/question/14457789
#SPJ1
