Answer:
The particularly severe winter of 1777-1778 proved to be a great trial for the American army, and of the 11,000 soldiers stationed at Valley Forge, hundreds died from disease. However, the suffering troops were held together by loyalty to the Patriot cause and to General Washington, who stayed with his men.
Answer:
1. why did the french help us
2. why did Cornwallis surrender
3. why did it take Cornwallis surrendering to America to get its recognized Independence
Explanation:
these questions just make sense in my head
Answer:
It had success such as Ethiopia's ability to remain independent and the Chilembwe insurrection inspiring the people; it also had it failures such as lack of technology and lack of unity. The conditions that led African peoples to resist colonial rule often emerged from longstanding grievances against colonial labor exploitation, taxation, racist and paternalist practices, arbitrary violence, and political illegitimacy. African states such as bribery and corruption, lack of democratic and participatory governance, insecurity, lack of justice and equality before the law, and illiteracy.
Problems of Independent West African States
Problems of national unity and cohesion: Overview and Case Studies. ...
Pervasive influence of the former colonial powers. ...
Authoritarian regimes. ...
The military as political rulers. ...
Problems of unemployment, under-employment and civil wars. ...
Population explosion, diseases and drought.
Explanation:
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
