1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Agata [3.3K]
3 years ago
7

B or D? Which of the following describes Hoover’s philosophical approach to stimulating the economy? Direct intervention: give d

irect relief to individuals to spark the economy. Top-down approach: give money and loans to businesses so they can create jobs. Wait and see: over time the economy would correct. Hands- off: allow businesses to generate new sources of wealth without government intervention.
History
1 answer:
Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago
3 0
"<span>Hands- off: allow businesses to generate new sources of wealth without government intervention" would be the best option since he did not believe in government intervention when it came to stimulating the economy. </span>
You might be interested in
Can someone explain to me a couple of things (more than one) obstacle immigrants faced when trying to access the pull factor tha
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Obstacles:

1.The sea, america would normally be hard to access for non-mexican immigrants due to the wide ocean blocking their way. They often take this dangerous journey across as they have no other choice.

Pull factors:

1.For most non-americans (like me), the country would probably be fantasized and thought to be a great modern country full of amazing opportunities. This may make them wish to immigrate to America.

7 0
3 years ago
The act gave parliament the right to make any laws they wished to regulate the colonies
shtirl [24]
It was the Declaratory Act<span> of 1766.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
From our vantage point in the twenty-first century we can identify many different social, economic, theological and cultural ele
Semenov [28]

Answer:

From a religious point of view, witch hunting was justified by the belief that witches served the devil and everything associated with the devil should be stopped.

This was directly linked to the culture of the population of that region, since people agreed that witches, for running away from Christian standards, should be punished.

Explanation:

There was, in Europe, the belief that witches were women who received demonic spirits, did jobs for the devil on earth, besides promoting all kinds of atrocities in the world.

European society was extremely religious and this religion was directly associated with the cultural aspects of that society, which had Christian concepts with absolute laws, which allowed those who disobeyed those concepts to be punished harshly. This supported witch hunting and allowed anyone (especially women) who was tried for witchcraft to be harshly punished, often with torture and death.

8 0
3 years ago
How many amendments to the United States constitution have been repealed by other amendments?
o-na [289]
The only amendment that has been repealed is prohibition.

It was repealed because it was hugely unpopular, totally ineffective and a large factor in increasing the power of the Mafia in the USA.

It was passed in the first place because of misguided nonsense paraded by well-meaning moralistic busybodies.

<span>Sort of like the war on the (rest of) drugs .... except many of those are still illegal and they were not part of a constitutional amendment.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
How were the sophists different from the other philosophers of ancient greece? explain ur answer
lilavasa [31]

Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.

Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.

Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal,  regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.

Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract,  out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.

In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was a justification for European imperialism in the late nineteenth century?
    12·2 answers
  • I mean this is Econ but I don't see a category for it sooo...
    13·1 answer
  • Why did it take john white 3 years to return to roanoke? A- he became ill with yellow fever B- his ships were needed for war C-
    8·1 answer
  • Why did political parties form in the United States
    9·2 answers
  • What is the MOST LIKELY reason the Battle of Bloody Marsh was vital to England and the English-owned colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • Which best defines the concept of popular sovereignty?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Islam affect India?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following are a freedom guaranteed in the First Amendment?
    5·1 answer
  • What did the Federalist Party oppose? <br><br> I need 8 things but anything helps thank you :)
    10·1 answer
  • ASAP!!!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!