1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
13

rench fur traders established fair trade with American Indians in North America. What is one item the traders sold to the Americ

an Indians in exchange for furs?
History
1 answer:
d1i1m1o1n [39]3 years ago
8 0
French fur traders traded two things with American Indians in those times. One were guns and the other horses. When the American Indians provided them with fur, they were given either horses or guns in exchange, both of which the Indians desperately needed in their fight with the US settlers. Read more on Brainly.com -
You might be interested in
If you do this for me I'll love you forever :)
KiRa [710]
In the Paleolithic period (roughly 2.5 million years ago to 10,000 B.C.), early humans lived in caves or simple huts or tepees and were hunters and gatherers. They used basic stone and bone tools, as well as crude stone axes, for hunting birds and wild animals.
6 0
3 years ago
Thomas Jefferson wanted what part of the Mississippi River?
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

the louisiana purchase

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP ( ASAP ) !!! I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST !!!!
iragen [17]
D he had a throat infection
7 0
3 years ago
How did the congress attempt to provide a legal basis for its authority?
9966 [12]
Congress attempt to provide a legal basis for its authority
3 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which group would most likely have opposed passage of 16 amendment
    13·1 answer
  • 9. What is a patron?
    7·1 answer
  • What impact was the transcontinental railroad designed to have on the West?
    6·1 answer
  • What long term impact did the berlin confrence have on africa
    10·1 answer
  • Before building a canal across Central America, the United States needed to buy rights from a company based in which country?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a result of Upton Sinclair’s novel the jungle
    10·2 answers
  • Describe three ways in which materials released by the volcano could impact the grassland area
    14·1 answer
  • In 3–5 sentences, describe the changes happening in Japan’s government during the 1930s.
    5·1 answer
  • Why do people create, structure, and change government?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the United States representative in 1972
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!