1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
const2013 [10]
3 years ago
9

How did many southerners view the North in the mid-1800s? Southerners thought that the North's wage labor system was a bad syste

m. Southerners thought that the North's wage labor system would also be good for the South. Southerners were critical of the North because the northern economy was based on slave labor. Southerners wanted people in the South to have the same equality as people in the North..
History
1 answer:
german3 years ago
5 0
Southerners were critical of the North and believed that the North's wage labor system was a bad system that they had no interest in putting into place in the south. The southern economy was based on slave labor and southerners wanted to continue the practice of slavery and prevent any transition away from this. 
You might be interested in
4. According to this document, what did Sennacherib's forces do to the
dusya [7]

What Sennacherib's forces do to the towns surrounding Jerusalem was to use its military force to attack and conquer them, and maintaining its dominion in that Middle East region.

> Although you forgot to attach the document, we did deep research to find it and the document is dated about 701 BCE.

> It is a passage written in cuneiform scripture.

> The passage refers to the successful military campaigns of Sennacherib in those years.

> In the text you can read that Sennacherib tried to defeat Hezekiah.

> Sennacherib surrounded towns and conquered 46 towns that were fortified.

> His military strength and strategies were too much for their adversaries.

> The text refers that Sennacherib commanded an army of more than 200,000 troops.

> In the final part of the passage, it says that Sennacheribtook Hezekiah prisoner in the city of Jerusalem (modern-day Israel).

We can conclude that Sennacherib was a great military strategist that attacked and conquered his enemies, using effective strategics and full logistics that included men, animals, and weapons to defeat enemies in the trenches.

Learn more about this topic here:

brainly.com/question/23877405?referrer=searchResults

7 0
3 years ago
Sumerian religion taught that people were created in order to __________. A. amuse the gods B. maintain the cities C. pay tribut
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

B. maintain the cities

Explanation:

The numerical religion defended the existence of a group of divine beings that governed the entire universe, looked like human beings, but were gods and lived in the pantheon. These beings were immortal and created human beings, who, although mortal, had as their main function to be responsible for the maintenance and organization of cities, where the gods could transit and do their works, even if invisible to human beings.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The process of mummification was connected to the egyptian belief in
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

Egyptian civilization - Religion - Mummification. The ancient Egyptians believed in the resurrection of the body and life everlasting. ... For example, the body had to be preserved through mummification and given a properly furnished tomb with everything needed for life in the afterworld.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!! I WILL GIVE THE BRAINLIEST
julsineya [31]

Answer:

1. President Theodore Roosevelt’s big stick policy was used by the United States to negotiate an agreement for an American-led canal through Panama, spread American influence in Cuba, and broker a peace treaty between Russia and Japan. Big Stick diplomacy is the policy which refers to a carefully mediated negotiation "speak softly, and carry a big stick." and Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for it in 1906.

2.

<em>The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  </em>

<u>President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  </u>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
IN WHAT WAY DID CAHOKIA RESEMBLE NATIVE AMERICAN CITIES IN MEXICO ???? !!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE HELP ME I WILL GIVE 5 STARS THANKS AN
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

In 2009 the CA camera got distroy

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sort the details about Jansky and Reber
    12·1 answer
  • I need help with this another 20 points
    13·1 answer
  • How can I make a difference in a democracy
    10·1 answer
  • What were the conditions in the South and North?
    6·2 answers
  • What did the north want during the Kansas Nebraska Act?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of governments would have the least amount of music censorship?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the decision in Commonwealth v Hunt and why it is significant?
    8·1 answer
  • In which present-day state was the short-lived state of franklin once located
    12·1 answer
  • Who do you think benefitted most during reconstruction?<br><br> Please help me answer this question?
    6·1 answer
  • 6. Links between History and other sciences (give examples)?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!