1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Virty [35]
3 years ago
9

Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu. Read this excerpt from Susan B. Anthony's "Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the

United States to Vote? " and complete the sentences that follow. But is urged, the use of the masculine pronouns he, his and him, in all the constitutions and laws, is proof that only men were meant to be included in their provisions. If you insist on this version of the letter of the law, we shall insist that you be consistent, and accept the other horn of the dilemma, which would compel you to exempt women from taxation for the support of the government, and from penalties for the violation of laws. . . . So long as any classes of men were denied their right to vote, the government made a show of consistency, by exempting them from taxation. When a property qualification of $250 was required of black men in New York, they were not compelled to pay taxes, so long as they were content to report themselves worth less than that sum; but the moment the black man died, and his property fell to his widow or daughter, the black woman's name would be put on the assessor's list, and she be compelled to pay taxes on the same property exempted to her husband. The same is true of ministers in New York. So long as the minister lives, he is exempted from taxation on $1,500 of property, but the moment the breath goes out of his body, his widow's name will go down on the assessor's list, and she will have to pay taxes on the $1,500. So much for the special legislation in favor of women. Susan B. Anthony makes two compelling arguments to suggest that women should be given the right to vote. She attacks the argument of the anti-suffragists that . She argues that since , all women should be afforded the right to vote.
English
1 answer:
sineoko [7]3 years ago
4 0

Susan B. Anthony makes two compelling arguments to suggest that women should be given the right to vote. She attacks the argument of the anti-suffragists that (women are not entitled to vote because all the laws were created by men for men) She argues that since (women are forced to pay all the taxes despite there being no mention of females in tax laws) all women should be afforded the right to vote.

You might be interested in
Can someone help me with this assignment​
Murrr4er [49]
Sorry, I can’t do the second but here’s the first!!!

3 0
2 years ago
What does the dialogue show about why thomas wants patrick's help
Nataliya [291]
You need to put the dialogue
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are creating a public service announcement warning kids about the danger of posting personal information on the Internet. De
GenaCL600 [577]
The three types of appeals:

-Pathos: appeal to emotions: make the children imagine someone can read their thoughts and knows their last embarrassing memory; then compare it to the personal information that can be leaked

-Ethos: appeal to the general argument that everyone should have the right to decide who knows what about whom

-Logos: appeal to logic:  tell the that if their personal information is leaked, it can be used by other people, if if it's not leaked, it won't be used by other people
7 0
3 years ago
What are some examples of the destructive force of conformity in society
Zolol [24]

Answer:

funny i wrote about this awhile ago here- im pretty sure its that- i hope this helps! <3

Explanation:

I cannot say I am a psychologist and I cannot say I am a sociologist. I would not be able to engage in an intellectual conversation about the way the brain works or any of the millions of reasons why humans think and interact the way they do. However, I will claim to be an expert people-watcher.

I love watching the way humans interact with each other in those awkward moments of honesty and think it’s hilarious to watch someone completely avoid human interaction by any means necessary. If you’ve spent any amount of time sitting on a park bench or simply observing the world around you, I’m sure you’ve partaken in your fair share of people watching.

The other day as I was leaving one of my classes, there were two girls walking in front of me. They weren’t far ahead so I could understand their conversation. I wasn’t paying much attention to them until I heard one of the girls say there was no way she could go to the bars that night. Her friend responded with a list of reasons as to why she could go out. The first speaker paused for a moment and then agreed, she had changed her mind that fast. I thought to myself, “Wow. That wasn’t much of an argument. I wonder why she didn’t even put up a little fight.” Then it occurred to me, humans are incredibly susceptible to persuasion.

To a certain extent, it’s almost as if we crave it. For some reason, we are drawn to the idea that we are set on our beliefs but crave for people to attempt to change them. Often, it usually works. Why is that? How does persuasion work?

At first, I thought that it might be because humans like to be told what to think. In today’s society, it’s impossible to walk outside without experiencing some form of communication whether it be verbal, auditory, or written. This being said, it’s become all too easy to let society tell us what to believe through the constant swarm of messages attempting to achieve communication with us. Is it because we’re lazy? Are we no longer capable of developing core beliefs we can stand by?

The answer is no. We can. The brain forms beliefs the same way it forms self-esteem. It follows patterns that we experience and turns them into pathways that are basically engraved into our brains. A person is more likely to have a strong belief about an experience or emotion that has directly related to their past. These experiences develop into the beliefs that people often carry into their adult life. So, if these beliefs are physically part of who we are as a wrinkle on our brain, how is it that we somehow forget them the second we are confronted with persuasion?

Persuasion can be interpreted in many ways but is loosely defined as symbolic communication between two or more people with the intent of changing, boosting or forming a belief of the person being persuaded. That is a more technical definition, but most people know persuasion when they see it. It comes in all forms and we can usually comprehend when someone or something is attempting to persuade us. Why doesn’t that set off a trigger in our brain to remind us of our beliefs that we already hold?

I have a hypothesis.

Could it be that the modern society growing around us is eroding our ability to truly believe in something through its relentless attempt to communicate a thousand beliefs at one time?

Imagine sitting in a room with a group of friends while the television, radio and iPod are playing at max volume. It would be difficult to concentrate on any single audio message attempting to communicate with you. Most likely, you can get a jist of everything going on but you will not be fully invested in any of the audio stimuli around you.

Now, compare that to the way society attempts to carve beliefs into the human brain by any means possible. If you were to log onto any form of social media, you would immediately be exposed to a thousand different beliefs. As you continue to see the same beliefs over and over again they form the wrinkles in your brain like I stated before. The thing is, at what point do the beliefs become deep enough? If you have thousands of deep beliefs, are they truly that important to you?

8 0
3 years ago
Write about someone who’s lived on a tropical island their whole life and is liveing it for the very first time.
lys-0071 [83]

The cold water rushed against my bare legs as I sat alone on the beach. The sky was turning a dark blue and the clouds were starting to make way for the moon. By this time, everyone was starting to pack up their things and head back towards their hut. When it was time for us to leave, I had told my Mother that I wanted to stay for a couple more minutes. A couple more minutes turned into hours and now, here I was: planning my escape from the island I once called home.

I looked out onto the island, taking in it’s essence one more time. Goodbye, home.

My life will begin soon.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are American literature and the American identity interrelated?
    13·1 answer
  • Which detail best supports the author's opinion that Kalhat<br><br> is a secure city?
    14·2 answers
  • If the results of the study are true, what strategy would you propose for naming hurricanes? Why?
    9·1 answer
  • In stealing freedom how does Ann and her family feel at the beginning of Ch. 9 about her brothers being gone?
    6·1 answer
  • This Side of Paradise (excerpt) F. Scott Fitzgerald 1 FOR YEARS AFTERWARD when Amory thought of Eleanor he seemed still to hear
    15·1 answer
  • im 16 turning 17 on august next year and im gonna graduate year 12 on 2023 i will be 19, any thoughts,
    6·1 answer
  • Read this sentence : “he grew very tired of saying the same thing over a hundred times.” The language technique used in this is
    12·1 answer
  • Explain in your own words what slam poetry is
    6·2 answers
  • List topics that for take your notes by hand and
    10·1 answer
  • Contraction of tomorrow is​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!