1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fynjy0 [20]
3 years ago
14

Which is a false statement about the use of longitude and latitude lines on maps?

History
2 answers:
alexgriva [62]3 years ago
6 0

Answer

The false statement about the use of longitude and latitude lines on maps is that They are used to show the depth of the oceans.

Explanation

Longitude and latitude lines- these are imaginary lines that circle the globe in the east-west and north south directions. They can be used to show direction instead of a compass. and to identify the equator and prime meridian. On the maps they can also be used to locate things. They helps in labeling every place on the earth surface. Equator being the most useful line which runs horizontally around the fattest earth part. These lines are useful because they define the east-west position of the location of the planet earth.

Licemer1 [7]3 years ago
4 0
2 they cant show how deep the oceans is they can only give location and to identify the equators prime meridian
You might be interested in
How many representatives from each district
Drupady [299]
The House of Representatives. The states are also divided into 435<span> congressional districts with a population of about 710,000 each. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a 2-year term.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would the Constitutional Convention work now?
Studentka2010 [4]
No it would not hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
What was the basic units of sumerian civilization<br> a. theocratic governments<br> b. city-states
SOVA2 [1]
The answer is B. city-states.
8 0
3 years ago
Will give brainliest
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will give brainliest please I need help :)
GuDViN [60]

Explanation:

1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.

2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.

3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.

4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.

5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did state chartering of banks in early america make deposits secure
    14·1 answer
  • Help ASAP will give brainilest
    14·1 answer
  • For what is the battle of antietam best known?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the Teapot Dome scandal?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe life in Jamestown in 1-word based on this document.
    7·1 answer
  • How did the war create new opportunities for african american?
    10·1 answer
  • A summery of africa​
    11·1 answer
  • How did the opponents pf the civil right act of 1964 use the filibuster to try to block its passage
    8·2 answers
  • Which policy establishes the right of the United States to act as a policeman in the Western Hemisphere? A. the Roosevelt Coroll
    8·1 answer
  • How do immigrants impact the United states of America​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!