<span>An argument covering all of the elements of the subject. </span>
Answer:
i think the most productive answer would be How did it happen the last one :)
Explanation:
i hope this helped
"Sitting on the park bench" is the dangling modifier. Who is sitting on a park bench? Is it the sun? It does not make sense because you don't have a subject.
In our soicety today it is hard to find people that have a mature enough even attitude to take responibilty for themselves. Such as people on welfare that may be welfare because they need it or they just don't want to work. The responibility of acting another person is also very miss understood in this soicety. So my opinion is that individuals in this soicety need to take charge and step up to the plate.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Why I Wrote The Crucible: An artist’s answer to politics by Arthur Miller
According to Miller in paragraph 2, how have his memories of the time he wrote The Crucible changed? What purpose for writing does this suggest?
Answer:
Miller explains that, when he currently thinks about the time he wrote The Crucible, he no longer feels the 'dead weight of the fear' he had at that time. He reflects on how over the generations fears might change.
Explanation:
Therefore, we can infer that he understands writing as a way to leave a document of those events, fears, and feelings, to remember them, and especially to learn from them.