Answer:
A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other
D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public
Explanation:
A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other
[] With the secrecy rule, the delegates could speak openly since this would not reach the public. It helped to let them make decisions since there was less pressure from the public (ties into option D).
D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public
[] If the public didn't know what was going on, they could not pressure
The second and third options do not make sense because the delegates wanted everyone to attend (they also wanted the votes to be as unanimous as possible) and they were not planning specific military strategies at this time.
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly.
- Heather
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Pluralism." One negative effect of interest groups is that politicians today cater to the wants and needs of interest groups instead of to the needs of the public. This effect is called pluralism.
The Khmer Rouge made quite a few changes during their reign. They outlawed money, books, and religion. They also killed anyone believed to be of the "old society" which included intellectuals, merchants, and former government officials and former soldiers. They killed millions.
Answer:
A. a compact between states
Explanation:
The South fought the Civil War as a compact between states.
Hope this helped!
