1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
3 years ago
13

Explain the difference between a dictatorial government and a constitutional government

History
2 answers:
balandron [24]3 years ago
8 0
Consitutional is under a ruler that actually has restrictions

Under a dictatorship the dictator can do whatever they want and practically get away with it because he has no restrictions

It's like hitler ruling vs trump

Hitler was a dictator

Trump is a president so he can't just do anything he wants without going through congress thanks to the constitution

Make sense?
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
5 0
A dictatorial government is run by the leader/dictator...a constitutional government is run by many groups of government officials with the people's influence,the people have somewhat of a choice.
You might be interested in
What method did painters use to achieve a realistic style?
Korvikt [17]

Artists used and use linear perspective to create a realistic style. Linear perspective is when an artist bases shapes, figures, etc on their relation to the horizon. The ultimate effect of this is that it allows an artist to create depth (3D feeling) on a 2D piece of paper.

5 0
3 years ago
What is salvation history
Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

Although the word “history” sometimes refers to what has taken place, it more commonly refers to the story or account of what has taken place. No human account of what has taken place can ever be exhaustive: we simply do not and cannot know enough. For example, a history of the Roman Empire cannot possibly tell us everything that took place within the Roman Empire during the centuries the empire existed. Any history of the Roman Empire will necessarily be selective. A history will be judged as excellent or poor on the basis of how representative it is, how the parts are made to cohere, how evidence has been handled, and the like. However the history is organized, it involves sequence (keeping an eye on time), cause and effect, trends, and evaluation of significance.

Salvation history is thus the history of salvation — i .e., the history of events that focus on the salvation of human beings and issues involving the new heaven and the new earth. Even when the focus narrows to one man, Abraham, and his descendants, that man is given the promise that in him and in his seed all the nations of the earth will be blessed (Gen 12:3). Biblical Christianity is not an abstract or timeless philosophy (though of course it involves abstractions): at least in part, it is the account of what God has done, of the events and explanations he has brought about in order to save lost human beings. (Even what “salvation” means, what it means to be “saved,” is disclosed in this history.) From this, four things follow:

7 0
3 years ago
(25+ POINTS & BRAINLEST!) EASY! All of these presidents have one thing in common – except one. Who is the odd one out?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

your answer is b.john f kennedy

6 0
3 years ago
Why did Spain send conquistadors to the Americas?
Semenov [28]
They wanted to captuer it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Given that the Soviet Union fought in Afghanistan, why was it considered a proxy war?
a_sh-v [17]

It was a "proxy war" because it was a conflict in which the United States did not directly engage in battle.  

The USA and the USSR were on opposing sides, but it was  not a direct war between the USA and the USSR.  It was a "proxy war" within the larger Cold War situation.

Explanation:

The "Cold War" had that name because the two superpowers (the USA and USSR) did not fight a direct "hot" war against one another.  They engaged in a protracted stand-off against each other, and had an arms race of nuclear weapons and military strength.  They also supported "proxy wars" where they took opposing sides in conflicts happening in other parts of the world, such as the Six Day War in the Middle East in 1967, or the Soviet-Afghan war in the 1980s.

In the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), <em>GlobalSecurity </em>has reported:  The United States supported the Afghans fighting for their country's freedom in the 1980s - as did other countries, including Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, Egypt, and the UK."  So it served as a proxy war in the larger Cold War conflict between the US and its allies over against the Soviet Union's sphere of influence.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • This is a map of New York from 1842. The map shows a scale stating that one inch equals 1000 feet and the island is approximatel
    13·1 answer
  • I need helpppppppppppp
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these best explains the stance of the anti imperialist league
    8·1 answer
  • What was one reason for the founding of the NAACP? O A. The desire for more opportunity for immigrants O B. African Americans' d
    11·1 answer
  • How did the United States increase its involvement in Vietnam after the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution? It sent financial aid and US
    11·1 answer
  • Why did 5,000 blacks fight on the American side during the revolution<br>​
    5·1 answer
  • hey y'all I just really need help with this question so if y'all didn't mind and try to help me that would be greatHELP ME PLEAS
    9·2 answers
  • What happened to George washington/
    11·2 answers
  • WHO IS GOOD A HISTORY AND CAN DO THIS NO PLAGIARIZING IF YOU DO NOT PLAGIARIZE AND MAKE A GOOD ANSWER I WILL GIVE YOU THE BRAINL
    13·1 answer
  • The construction of huge monuments in Egypt served to _____. Select the best answer from the choices provided. A. provide work f
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!