Answer:
Explanation:
Defining characteristics of the parliamentary system are the supremacy of the legislative branch within the three functions of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—and blurring or merging of the executive and legislative functions. The legislative function is conducted through a unicameral (one-chamber) or bicameral (two-chamber) parliament composed of members accountable to the people they represent. A prime minister and the ministers of several executive departments of the government primarily carry out the executive function.
The political party or coalition of parties that make up a majority of the parliament’s membership select the prime minister and department ministers. The prime minister usually is the leader of the majority party, if there is one, or the leader of one of the parties in the ruling coalition. Some ceremonial executive duties are carried out by a symbolic head of state — a hereditary king or queen in a democratic constitutional monarchy, such as Great Britain, Japan, Norway, or Spain, or an elected president or chancellor in a democratic constitutional republic such as Germany, Italy, or Latvia. The judicial function typically is independent of the legislative and executive components of the system.
For one, they’re not a part of any treaty that prohibits the building of nuclear weapons.
A treaty of such magnitude exists, called the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Basically, the treaty says that nations can gain the technology and training for the use of nuclear technology from those that use nuclear technologies in exchange for using them for peaceful purposes. In other words, anyone that is a part of this treaty is allowed to build nuclear power plants to supply power for their country, not to build nukes.
Last time I checked, Israel is one of four countries that is not a part of this treaty. So, even if Israel did have nuclear weapons (technically, as I’ll explain later, no one can say for sure, but for all practical purposes, it does), it’s not as though they violated any rules, technically.
Answer:
Plains Indians (Plains Native Americans)
Explanation:
As the colonists moved west, they wanted more land. They wanted to establish more cities/villages in the plains and also in the west where the Native Americans lived. The Native Americans also depending on the migration of the animals - deer, buffalo, etc. - for hunting which provided them with food and clothing. However, when the colonists moved west, they put up more fences which prevented animals from freely moving among the plains. The fences also interrupted and changed the animal migration routes.
The spanish controlled the Philippines for Centuries
The spanish took control over philippines since 1565 and the philippines declared their independence from the spanish in 1898. That was more than 4 Centuries <span />
It influenced them because the colonists were closer to their home. the loyalists were far from their home
