The Three-Fifths Compromise was created to settle a dispute between Northern and Southern delegates.
<h3>What was Three-Fifths Compromise?</h3>
At the US Constitutional Convention, representatives from the Northern and Southern states reached a compromise by agreeing that three-fifths of the slave population.
This would be taken into account when ascertaining direct taxes and House of Representatives representation. Refer the image below for the complete question.
Therefore, The Three-Fifths Compromise to solve a dispute between Northern and Southern delegates.
To learn more about the three-Fifths Compromise, refer to:
brainly.com/question/4526851
#SPJ1
The correct answer is: B
The Fifth Amendment states that: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Answer:
the answer is that the federal govt. lost its power. The closest option to that would be C i think.
Explanation:
D - People who believed that the appropriate role of the government was to address the major social problems of the day
This is because the Progressives wanted better working conditions as well and wanted the government to regulate large monopolies.
Hope this helps!
The false statement here is :
b.
Secessionists in Texas often intimidated Unionists into not voting against secession.
Explanation:
Although Texas was at the forefront of the movement of Secession it had not grown so far as to become violent for the people who did not believe in it yet.
A sizable number of people in Texas were in favor of the union and remained so for the long duration of the war.
During the Act and the Convention this faction was led by the Governor of the state himself so there was no possibility of a complete rebellion that would make such cases of violence possible.
