Read the excerpt from "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?". But I fancy I hear some one of my audience say, “It is just in
this circumstance that you and your brother abolitionists fail to make a favorable impression on the public mind. Would you argue more, and denounce less; would you persuade more, and rebuke less; your cause would be much more likely to succeed.” But, I submit, where all is plain there is nothing to be argued. What point in the anti-slavery creed would you have me argue? On what branch of the subject do the people of this country need light? Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. Which statement best explains why this is an example of a counterclaim by Douglass? Douglass addresses a potential argument of the other side and makes a case against it. Douglass addresses a potential argument of the other side and admits the point is solid. Douglass makes a claim and offers facts to support it. Douglass makes a claim and admits the flaws within it.
<span>Zeus says that human tripulation are caused by human foolishness. for instancethey were running out of food so they decided to fish but then they realised that they were not good at it. they intended to it the cattle but Odysseus warned them. <span> </span></span>
