Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
1) Why did you come to Marion's party? Had you been invited?
2) The meeting was so chaotic. Had it been planned by anyone?
3) How long had the body been frozen before the scientists found it?
4) Had the man been known to the police when he turned up in the town?
5) How many times had your application been rejected before you succeeded?
6) Why did you take your raincoat? Had rainy weather been forecast | forecasted?
7) Had the parcel just been delivered when I arrived?
8) How long had it been forbidden before it was allowed again?
9) Why did the police arrive along with the firemen? Had the house been set on fire?
10) I didn't get the money on Friday. Had it been sent a long time before that?
<h2>
I hope I helped you ^_^</h2>
Answer: to help you answer this i would need more information
Answer:
C) logical evidence in the form of generalizations
Explanation:
Generalization occurs due to the convergence of situations that are comparable. Our real-world facts are hypotheses regarding circumstances that haven't been witnessed. The differences between persons is what differentiates their similarities.