Answer:
Aboriginal people saw their way of life as already ordained by the creative acts of the Dreaming beings and the blueprint that was their legacy, so their mission was simply to live in agreement with the terms of that legacy. There was thus no notion of progress and no room for competing dogmas or rebellion against the status quo. Everything that now existed was fixed for all time in the mythic past, and all that the living were asked to do, in order to guarantee the continuance of their world, was obey the law of the Dreaming and perform correctly the rituals upon which physical and social reproduction were said to depend. Human creativity was not excluded but was explained away. The Dreaming legacy was not a static dead weight of tradition but was forever being added to and enlivened, despite an ideology that proclaimed non-change and the need only to reproduce existing forms. This view of the world gave precedence to spiritual powers and explanations over mundane knowledge or human intellect, and it placed everyone squarely under the authority of the law rather than that of other people. Aboriginal people were constantly surrounded by proofs of the existence and power of spiritual forces—the landscape itself was a dominant representation of the Dreaming’s reality—and their everyday activities were in large measure a reenactment of those of the creative beings, making religion indivisible from the mundane concerns of daily life. Outside the ritual arena, and notwithstanding the superior rights of men over women and of older men over younger men, people valued their personal autonomy highly and were likely to react with anger and violence to any attempts by others to deny or diminish it.
In a limited government, the people who create the laws must follow the laws, and the citizens have choice in who becomes a lawmaker. They do this by electing officials and representatives.
Limited Government rights are;
The United States Constitution, written in 1787, extended the idea of a limited government by requiring the election of legislators by the people. These rights further limit the federal government by forbidding intervention on matters of individual choice such as speech or religion.
* do consider marking me brainliest, if it does help, do also correct me if I am wrong in some way. thank you <em><3</em>.
answer: the sons of liberty
explanation:
the sons of liberty were very opposed to the british ruling the american colonies the sons of liberty believed that the colonies did not deserve to be taxed just because britain was in heavy debt to its allies. hope this helps!
The correct answer is A. Marcus will win because she has the required number of electoral votes
Explanation:
In the U.S., the President is elected through the electoral college, which includes representatives of all states. In this context, the candidate needs to have at least 270 votes from the electoral college to be elected. Also, the candidate with more votes from the electoral college wins even if he/she has less popular votes or citizens votes than other candidates. This means in the case presented the winner is going to be Rosa Marcus because she obtained the necessary electoral votes to win (270 votes); while the candidate Torres obtained only 265, which are not enough votes to be elected even if he has more popular votes.
Answer:
anarchy
Explanation:
a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition f authority