Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
A is the right answer! hope i helped
I was found in the ground only to be brought up by rain left alone in a, field I bury back in yet I still feel the same
try living in my shoes they won’t fit
because I live in the earth
If you need to know how many she had left then... 2/5 x 1/3 = 6/15. Sorry if I came out rude, but I hope I helped! Let me know if you need anything else!
The best example of pathos might be this in the sentence '" I was afraid I was going to drown," said Wendy, who now lives in Silver Spring, Maryland. The entire trip was long and scary, she said.'
<h3>What is pathos?</h3>
- It is a rhetorical device.
- It is a resource that stimulates the reader's feelings.
In the sentence presented above, we can see that the narrator presents a series of feelings that were felt by Wendy.
The purpose of this is to stimulate the reader's emotions and make him empathize with Wendi's situation, understanding the moment she is going through and the feelings that result from it.
This is the purpose of pathos, which consists of stimulating empathy and making the reader feel emotions similar to what is being narrated, being compelled to defend and believe in what the narrator presents.
Learn more about pathos:
brainly.com/question/25836020
#SPJ1
