When European countries close polluting factories, it results negatively in people becoming unemployed and not getting the services they need.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Though it is true that the European countries are closing polluting factories, it isn't making a great difference because there are a lot of cars on the road that are polluting the environment.
But, the cars on the road have nothing to do with the closing of polluting factories.
Thus, it can't be termed as a negative effect of the closing down of polluting factories.
Also, the workers going back to being farmers and the school enrollments going up cannot be considered as 'negative' results of closing down the polluting factories.
Thus, the most relevant negative result can be said to be that the people become unemployed and cannot get the services they need.
C) People become unemployed and cannot get services they need.
Factories provide jobs which keeps unemployment rates down. They make thosands of jobs worldwide so, when European countries removed these factories it made the unemployment rates skyrocket.
What does it mean by the phrase, "how nature can help address these goal". I'm trying to understand what this statement means...plz help (will give brainliest)