Answer:
What does the IRR rule say about whether you should accept this opportunity?
The IRR rule basically states that if the project's internal rate of return (IRR) is higher than the cost of capital (discount rate or WACC), then the project should be accepted. In this case, we are not given the company's WACC or any discount rate we can use, therefore there is nothing to compare the project's IRR against.
Based on prior experience, this project's IRR will not be very high and if we consider the cost of keeping the site clean forever, I really doubt that the project is profitable. If you calculate the project's IRR without including the perpetual cleaning cost, IRR = 11%.
If we assume any of the 3 WACCs I used as an example below, the project's IRR including cleaning costs:
- if WACC = 12%, then IRR = 9.26% REJECTED
- if WACC = 10%, then IRR = 8.98% REJECTED
- if WACC = 9%, then IRR = 8.79% REJECTED
- if WACC = 8%, then IRR = 8.54% ACCEPTED
In order for this project to be profitable, the WACC would need to be very low (around 8% or less).
Explanation:
cost of opening a new mine $120 million
annual cash flow $20 million
expected cleaning costs $2 per year in perpetuity
the cost of keeping the site clean forever = $2 million / discount rate or WACC:
- if WACC = 12%, then perpetual cost = $16.67 million
- if WACC = 10%, then perpetual cost = $20 million
- if WACC = 9%, then perpetual cost = $22.22 million
- if WACC = 8%, then perpetual cost = $25 million
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1. Equipment Dr $21,300
To cash $21,300
(Being the equipment is purchased for cash)
For recording this we debited the equipment as it increased the assets and credited the cash as it reduced the assets
2. Cash Dr $6,100
To Service revenue $6,100
(Being the cash received is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased the assets and credited the service revenue as it increased the revenue
3. Rent expense $900
To Cash $900
(Being the rent is paid)
For recording this we debited the rent expense as it increased the expenses and credited the cash as it reduced the assets
4. Office supplies Dr
To Account payable
(Being the office supplies purchased on account)
For recording this we debited the office supplies as it increased the assets and credited the account payable as it increased the liabilities
5. Salaries expense
To cash
(Being the salaries paid is recorded)
For recording this we debited the salaries expense as it increased the expenses and credited the cash as it reduced the assets
Answer: $18,224 unfavourable
Explanation:
The materials quantity variance for the month will be calculated thus:
= Standard Cost per unit × ( Actual materials Used - Actual output)
= 13.4 × [( 4,300 - 700) × 4.2]
= $18,224 unfavourable
Therefore, the materials quantity variance for the month is $18,224 unfavourable
Answer:
A) It is subtracted from the Bonds Payable balance and shown with long-term liabilities on the balance sheet
Explanation:
The discount on Bonds payable, as their name implies, decrease the Bonds Payable carrying value. A bond with discounts, was issued at a lower price than his face value. The discount on bonds represent that difference.
It takes amortization while the time past, until at maturity, their balance is zero, to represent the reality, the obligation for the company is for the face value, so the carrying value of bonds payable should equal the face value.
Last, because the bonds are due in ten-year their place is the long-term liabilities. As their obligation are not within the 12 month period to qualify as short-term
