Roman Tsars were also called caesar. One way they underestimated their own ruling is that they thought they were <span>Invincible</span>, which wasn't true. They started concentrating on other things, and not on ruling and military. That resulted in rebellions and invasions.
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
The statement is True. Understanding what is a point of view and how does it act on someone's perception is not only helpful but imperative to the study of history.
Explanation:
A source is any material -- be it written, visual or voiced -- from a past event, the historian is studying.
Any material has a point of view. There is no source that has a complete view of the event from when and where it was produced. The same way any of us now can't give a complete explanation of what is happening right now, no source from the past can.
Thus historians use many sources in order to produce historical knowledge. Because of this, they have to learn to take into account the source's point of view to better evaluate it.
The Girondins tended to represent areas outside Paris and favored
keeping he king alive. The Mountain represented the interests of
radicals in Paris.
hope this help!!!!!!!!!
The costs of fighting the war for American Indians were that they lost many men, women, and even children in the conflict--the benefits were that they at least delayed slightly American conquest of their lands. i hope this helps.
During Grant's war of attrition,<em> it was bad that the Union army stayed on the offensive</em> <em>because their defensive positions each time were poor</em>. Their number of casualties grew poorer each time that they battled. But, despite this, Grant believed that the Union's supplies and manpower could overwhelm the Confederacy. Grant predicted that <em>this war of attrition would weaken the Confederacy</em>. Finally, there was no winning of neither side, but future consequences, as the Confederacy came to an end.
