Answer : A, once policies are written into state constitutions they become harder to change, requiring a new constitutional amendment.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
D
Explanation:
At a preliminary hearing, a judge hears the state's evidence and decides whether there is sufficient evidence to require the defendant to stand trial. ... No judge is present but the grand jury is instructed to review the evidence according to a probable cause standard and determine whether there is sufficient evidence.
D- water
Merry Christmas! Please mark brainliest
Answer:
The gist of this is that South Carolina was trying to remove the federal income tax from their state, meaning that their state wasn't going to force anyone to pay their federal taxes. The reasoning behind this was that the South Carolina government deemed the laws requiring citizens to pay federal income tax unconstitutional. The Federal Government obviously disagreed with this, so there was a lot of arguing over whether or not South Carolina's citizens had to pay their federal income taxes.
In the end, both sides got what they wanted, as South Carolina got less tariffs from the federal government, and the federal government got the citizens of South Carolina to pay their federal income taxes.
The options of the question are, A) people in Latin America welcomed the increase in U.S. investments. B) people in Latin America worked to create democracies in their countries. C) people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. D) people in Latin America hoped the U.S. would continue to help their governments.
The correct answer is C) people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.
<em>The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. </em>
President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.