1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
3 years ago
14

Was the Treaty of Versailles a good peace treaty for the future? Write a paragraph that answers this question. Begin with a clea

r topic sentence, such as “The Treaty of Versailles was a good peace treaty for the future” or “The Treaty of Versailles was not a good peace treaty for the future.” The remainder of the paragraph should include facts to support your claim.
History
2 answers:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
7 0

The Treaty of Versailles was <u>not</u> a good peace treaty for the future.  The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles put Germany in a situation that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, leading to World War II.

The Treaty of Versailles, which came out of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, was very punitive towards Germany.  Germany was forced to admit responsibility for causing the Great War (World War I).  We now call that "the war guilt" clause of the treaty.  Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the Allies (who opposed Germany in the war).   The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded.  The Great Depression was worse in Germany than in America.  The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

den301095 [7]3 years ago
4 0
The treaty of Versailles was not a good peace treaty because even though it brought world war I to an end, it is a big factor in starting world war II. It put the Germans in Great debt and completely ruined their economy. Many Germans were very mad about this. The treaty also said that they are the ones to blaim for the whole war. Things like this is what drove people like Adolf Hitler to take charge and try and save Germany, even if it meant a whole other war and passing the blaim to a whole other race.
You might be interested in
Winston Churchill's 1940 speech and Joseph Stalin's 1941 speech both
Travka [436]

Answer:

A. It was courted by countries across the world that hoped to purchase its arms and supplies.

Explanation:

Took the quiz.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two sentences explain the North's opposition to the use of slavery in the South?
RideAnS [48]
It's definitely A as one answer, but I'm unsure about the other answer. But I can almost 100% say that C is most likely the second answer. I hope I helped in some ways!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following took the many confusing Roman laws and organized them into a uniform set of rules that applied to the Byz
choli [55]

Justinian I.

Explanation:

The Roman have had their own unique set of laws that they implement on all new territories that they have conquered. Everyone had to obey these laws and respect them. The problem was that as the society was becoming more and more developed the Roman laws started to gradually lose sense or to be badly formatted for the changed circumstances, thus creating lot of confusion.

Justinian I decided to change this. He took the Roman laws, sorted them out properly and in accordance to the needs of the people and the state. He then changed some and also implemented some new ones. All in all, Justinian managed to create a better organized, more developed, practical, and modern set of laws. He created the Justinian Code.

4 0
3 years ago
Three topics are provided; you can include up to two more of interest. Include informed opinion about how and whether the change
aleksley [76]

Explanation: during the years 1865-1877 alot of things where going wrong. Then again alot of things were going wrong dating back to the years of    but none where as bad as what was coming during the laws creation. also because of the great Reconstuction african americans status had to be noticed. even though this was done it didn't protect the african americans from white persucation and discrimnation. SO basiclly the entire law failed. Even then the goverment didn't give up so but then The Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction was Lincoln's plan to reintegrate the Confederate states back into the Union, granting presidential pardons to all Southerners (except political leaders) who took an oath of future allegiance to the Union. Which made bad news for the african americans. though in the end it was so-so resolved when they gave african americans education, voting right and more.

4 0
3 years ago
What did the discoveries of the skeletons of Lucy and Ardi reveal?
slava [35]
The earliest ancestors of humans lived in Africa
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • QUESTION 13 Which of the following would be the most likely to benefit from the economic growth of the early eighteenth century?
    7·1 answer
  • Which leader government crumbled after the fall of sicily?
    10·1 answer
  • Factory floor workers are organized with​ _______ system.
    6·1 answer
  • List three (3) forms of solid medications
    13·1 answer
  • Would you rather live in a world with no emotions or live in a world with no such thing called love
    14·2 answers
  • Ford is BEST known for
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me quickly, i will give brainliest if i can!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which detail from ""The Future of Money"" supports the opinion that digital currency is safer than traditional currency?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me !!!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Why were some hillsides cut into long steps during when the Incas lived??
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!