Answer:
• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier
Explanation:
• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier• The closing of the frontier
The Mandate of Heaven is a Chinese political and religious doctrine to justify the rule of the King or Emperor of China. According to this belief, <em>Heaven</em> bestows a mandate on the ruler of China. However, if he was overthrown, or if natural disasters occurred, this was considered an indication that the ruler had lost the mandate. Therefore, civilian rebellions were accepted as part of the cycle. The cycle had the following pattern:
- A New Dynasty Rises
- A New Dynasty Rules
- Mandate of Heaven Lost by the Dynasty
- The Dynasty Grows Weak
- Period of Violence Follows
According to Chinese citizens, a new dynasty would rise and become powerful. This would lead them to rule as long as they received the mandate of heaven. However, if heaven was displeased with the ruler, the dynasty would lose its mandate. As a consequence, China would experience natural disasters, rebellions and the weakening of the dynasty. A period of violence and rebellion on the part of the citizens would follow, until a different dynasty arose from the chaos and became the ruling dynasty and the cycle continued.
Answer:
A or B
Explanation:
Engineers have built aqueducts, or canals, to move water, sometimes many hundreds of miles. Actually, aqueducts aren't a high-tech modern invention—the ancient Romans had aqueducts to bring water from the mountains above Rome, Italy to the city.
Answer:
One benefit from a healthier lunch alternative program is that people are more than likely going to make better food choices but one cost would be that everyone may be mad at you for cutting out junk foods in the lunch program, possibly hurting you chances of reelection.