Answer:
Fannie Mae would argue that "to the order of" is a complete order instrument that needs endorsement and can be enforced. "Pay to the order of" are negotiable instruments that must be paid via endorsement and delivery.
Explanation:
The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) wanted to foreclose on the house and sell it to recover the balance due. Smith argued that the words "to the order of " in the endorsement made the note an incomplete order instrument and that Fannie Mae could not enforce it. What is Fannie Mae's best response to this argument
Smith argued, among other things, that the indorsement on the note rendered it incomplete and "insufficient to support the use of executory process and,the words "to the order of [blank]" included in the subject indorsement made the instrument incomplete order paper, not bearer paper, and thus Fannie Mae could not properly enforce the note.However,Fannie Mae would argue that "to the order of" is a complete order instrument that needs endorsement and can be enforced. "Pay to the order of" are negotiable instruments that must be paid via endorsement and delivery.
Answer:
The correct answer is $1,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
Receives a loan = $100,000
Withdraws = $50,000
Interest rate = 2%
So, we can calculate the implicit cost by using following formula:
Implicit cost = Withdrawal amount × Tax rate
By putting the value, we get
Implicit cost = $50,000 × 2%
= $1,000
I took the business class last year but if I remember correctly Net profit is more important to consider because even if your net profit is 0, your company is still a success.
