Answer: This movement was known as the "birther movement"
Explanation:
This movement falsely asserted Obama was not qualified to be President of the United States because he was not a natural citizen of the United States of America as required by Article Two of the Constitution.
Answer:
According to the above passage, the Korean war was started by Americans.
Explanation:
The above passage addresses Americans as an enemy and invaders, which suggests that the passage is taken from the textbook of North Korea.
In the given passage, Americans are held responsible for starting the Korean war by first bombing on the North on June 25th. The passage also gives details that Americans were preparing for war for a long time, and when they got a chance they bombed the area. They crawled the 38th parallel, a line that kept North Korea and South Korea divided.
Therefore, the answer to the question is that Americans, according to this passage, started the Korean War.
Answer:
Chief Justice Earl Warren argued in the Brown decision that separate could never be equal because public education—which is a right for every citizen and deserved equal protection in accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment—had separate educational facilities for whites, and for blacks. This implied that both races were treated separately; being separated in such a way could not make them equally protected as expected by the constitution.
Answer:
Crusades affected Medieval Europe in various ways. One of them was to spread trade and knowledge in Europe.
Explanation:
This is what helped the European economy get strong while the feudalism was being destroyed. Crusades were organized by Christians from West Europe after centuries of wars for spreading Islam. The purpose of crusades was to stop the expansion of Muslim countries, the return of Christianity and territories that once belonged to the Christians.
Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
