Answer: Because it would mean the end of the Roman Republic.
Rome had been a republic for over 400 years. The Roman senate had abolished the monarchy of Rome in 509 BC after the scandal when the heir to King Tarquin did unpleasing things to a noblewoman who ended her life
Explanation: and thats it
<span>Long’s plans were very radical in the
sense that he expected everybody in the American society to allow their wealth
to be restructured and shared equitably.</span>
<span> Long’s idea did not come to fruition as they were controversial and did not gain
support among the senate, therefore he offered to work with opposition to the
democrats. However, they led to the second new deal, which had aspects of Longs
principles. This guided the social welfare; therefore, some of long’s ideas
came into reality.</span>
Long based his ideas on the biblical
laws. These were God’s laws of sharing and making sure that the society was
equal
Long speech was contentious and it
gained many critics. This can be attributed the factor that most of the rich
whom he sought to reduce their wealth were the same people who were supposed to
approve the ideas.
Long predicted that if at all his ideas
were not inculcated into the society, then the existing system would destroy
American society.
Answer:
This question forces the answer to come off as rather bias, so I’m going to try and be as factual as possible. The constitution and Declaration of Independence are very important, as well as having the freedom of speech and a diverse category of other freedoms that many other countries do not.
Hope this helps!
The correct answer is: "it violates the right to privacy".
The USA PATRIOT Act was enacted in 2001 as a reponse to the September 11 attacks and signed by President George Bush. The name of this act is actually an acronym which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001"
The Patriot Act in its Tittle II confers increased powers to surveillance agencies and bodies dependent of the federal government. Its promoters argued it was a necessary measure to suceed on the war against terrorism. On the other hand, its detractors claimed that these provisions went against individual freedoms and basic civic rights.
Germany was divided after WWII because they were divided into four occupied Zones, Great Britain, France, Us, and The Soviet Union everyone was under a different country’s plan and it completely divided the country. For the second part you did not include the memo so I can’t base it off that so just read the memo and give a simple explanation if you agree or disagree
