1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
3 years ago
10

Under what doctrine, codified in which federal statute, might the defendants have claimed to be immune from the jurisdiction of

a u.s. court? should this law include an exception for "state-sponsored terrorism"? why or why not?
History
1 answer:
Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
7 0
<span>The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - Title 28, 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602 1611 of the United States Code places limits on suing foreign sovereign nations in State or Federal courts. The law should not include exceptions for state-sponsored terrorism. These offences are direct attacks against a nation and are covered within context of any other attack on the nation or its people.</span>
You might be interested in
Please help me out i would really appreciate it
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

Answer:

Option B.) Granary

3 0
3 years ago
35. What was the result of Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854?
VMariaS [17]
The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed the people to vote if wanted to allow slavery in those states and this act served to appeal the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery in the north. This act was also said to be a failure because it was made to end the conflict over slavery, but resulted in Kansas becoming a "battleground over slavery."
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match each Great Society program, agency, or law to the correct description.
FrozenT [24]
I have no idea but it’s probably fair housing I’m not sure tho good luck stay safe maby it’s c
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the main people who were empathetic about adding the bill of rights??
Jobisdone [24]
The anti- federalist wanted the addition of the Bill of Rights added on to the Constitution

The federalist did not support the addition of the Bill of Rights because they believed that the Constitution already had enough rights included while the anti federalist wanted more rights actually stated
4 0
3 years ago
On what idea did patriots and loyalists most disagree
lina2011 [118]

The colonies were better off governing themselves without British influence.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the growth of the black middle class assist the civil rights movement
    11·1 answer
  • What does each of the three branches of government do?<br> i NEED HELP!
    8·2 answers
  • According to the Declaration of independence, From where Do governments derive the right to govern
    15·2 answers
  • After President Johnson adopted much of Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction, what are two additional things he did that upset Cong
    8·1 answer
  • Where is the cotton for the tshirt<br> grown?
    6·2 answers
  • Zoroastrianism developed in which ancient empire?
    13·1 answer
  • “More than in any other era, politics in the [late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries] was revolutionary politics. It did not d
    11·1 answer
  • What was one difference between the Estates General and the National
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the British enact the Stamp Act for colonists?
    14·1 answer
  • All of the following statements about the North Central Plains are true except:
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!