1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ira [324]
3 years ago
13

What’s ongoing issue in the Middle East does this passage illustrate

History
2 answers:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
8 0
The passage describes the struggle of the Kurdish minority so it will be the third option hope this helps :)
saul85 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

  The struggle of ethnics minorities for rights.

Explanation:

  The Kurdish are an Iranian ethnic group located in western Asia. Although it is one of the five largest ethnics groups in the region, Kurds in Turkey had been subjects of different kinds of racism through the years. With the coup of 1980, the Kurdish language was prohibited in public and private life.

  In the middle east, the ethnics minorities had almost none right that protects their culture.

  I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
What was the role of the Caliphs?
laila [671]

Answer:

The position of caliph became hereditary during the Umayyad Caliphate, making it the first Islamic dynasty. ... One of the responsibilities of the Caliph was to protect the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina.

Explanation:

hope this helps have a good rest of ur day/night <3 :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Genghis Khan’s policy about other religions in the Mongol Empire?
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

The answer would be A but I am so sorry if it's wrong

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BRAINLIEST AND EXTRA POINTS IF CORRECT<br><br> 5
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

for which question??????

...................................

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The constitution prohibits the enactment of ________ laws, which make acts committed before the laws in question were passed pun
sveticcg [70]
I think the constitution prohibits the enactment of ex post facto. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the decision in Dred Scott v. Stanford so significant?
KIM [24]

Answer:

The Significance of Dred Scott v Sanford is that the decision was a landmark decision during the time, as it delcared that all African-American, regardless of freed or enslaved status, were not to be declared legal citizens of the United States. It also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. While it was intended to settle the slavery debate and tensions going on at the time, it instead deepened tensions between the abolitionist North and pro-slavery South that would eventually lead to Civil War. In contemporary times, Dred Scott is considered one of, if not the worst Supreme Court ruling in the Supreme Courts history.

Explanation:

Hope that helps :)

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which description is least likely to be true of a totalitarian state
    5·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of a political party's national convention?
    9·2 answers
  • American soldiers often quarled with each other and refuse to take orders true or false
    10·1 answer
  • Using what you read in the article and in Bolívar's
    10·2 answers
  • A historian would like to analyze American history using the historical thinking skill of periodization. Which of the following
    13·2 answers
  • Place the events of the french revolution in order from beginning to end. The turning points illustrate change over time.
    8·1 answer
  • WHEN AND WHERE ARE VOTES COUNTED IN NATIONAL ELECTIONS? <br><br><br> someone answer this!?
    15·1 answer
  • Defina republicanos da abolição
    12·1 answer
  • In the "corrupt bargain,” what did Clay gain by supporting Adams?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the alliance system in Europe contribute to the start of World War I?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!