I answered as fast as I could :sunglasses:
Answer:
The correct answer according to me is option B or D..
Does our culture consider cooks and carpenters to be as high in their status as lawyers or doctors (remember I'm not asking what we think, but what value our culture generally gives to those professions)? Our culture creates a distinction that we sometimes refer to as "blue collar" work versus "white collar" work.
In the Middle Ages and even for much of the Renaissance, the artist was seen as someone who worked with his hands—they were considered skilled laborers, craftsmen, or artisans. This was something that Renaissance artists fought fiercely against. They wanted, understandably, to be considered as thinkers and innovators. And during the Renaissance the status of the artist does change dramatically, but it would take centuries for successful artists to gain the extremely high status we grant to "art stars" today (for example, Pablo Picasso, Andy Warhol, Jeff Koons, or Damien Hirst).
Answer:
b. The painting has an overall decorative-pattern effect and a flattened sense of space.
Explanation:
Fauvism has as its common axis the exploration of the wide possibilities posed by the use of color. The freedom with which they use pure tones, never mixed, manipulating them arbitrarily, far from concerns with verisimilitude, gives rise to flat surfaces, without light-dark illusionists. The sharp brushes build spaces that are, first of all, smooth areas, illuminated by reds, blues, and oranges. Fauvism was an experimental stage in European art, and Matisse was its major representative. That's why his painting has this pattern of colors and the way he arranges the objects in the canvas. Everything was made to expand the boundaries of the art, and the understanding of it.
