Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
Answer:
Conflict of interest
.
Explanation:
The scenario depicts a conflict of interest. Rhonda's decision benefits Rhonda at the expense of the company. Rhonda does not fulfill the responsibility to ensure that the company stays profitable, which is a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest, one of the most common ethical issues identified by employees, exists when a person must choose whether to advance his or her own personal interests or those of others.
Answer:
insurance company will pay $75 to Alfred.
Explanation:
given data
Actual cost of camera = $200
Alfred cost of camera = $150
Life expectancy = 6 years
solution
we get here first Remain life of camera that is
Remain life of camera = 6 years - 3 years
Remain life of camera = 3 years
and
now we get here current cost of the camera that is
current cost of camera = Alfred cost of camera × (Remain life of camera ÷ Life expectancy) ........................1
put here value and we get
Current cost of camera = $150 × 
Current cost of camera = $75
so that insurance company will pay $75 to Alfred.
a house, duh, clothing can be hung and stored, potato chips are bagged, a magazine is almost useless, but a house needs plants trimmmed and rooms cleaned and taking care of bugs and such
Answer:
$410,000
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory under the LIFO method is shown below:
= Year end cost + difference of amount × price level index
where,
Year end cost = Beginning cost
Difference of amount = $400,000 - $300,000 = $100,000
Price level index = $440,000 ÷ $400,000 = 1.1
So, the inventory cost is
= $300,000 + $100,000 × 1.1
= $300,000 + $110,000
= $410,000
