Answer: B
Could stop state governments from passing unfair laws
The legalization of some controlled subtances has always been a contreversial issue. Nevertheless, despite of its controversy, it has several arguments that can be expressed in favor of it. First of all, in some cases related to depression and anxiety, controlled substances can be a way in which people can obtain willingness to live, and also, it can help to improve the mood and self-esteem they have. Moreover, when some factors do not allow people to easily get reasons to stay alive, these type of substances can be helpful to increase people's happiness, to avoid bad thinkings and to remove some negative feelings such as; fear, pity and even regret. Therefore, their quality of living can also get higher, if they try some substances, under control.
I think that the answer is A but not for sure.
Answer: Russia entered not ready for war.
Explanation:
Since the beginning of the conflict, Lenin has opposed Russia's entry into the war. However, other political authorities were rigid in demanding war. In this way, they wanted attention from Russia's internal problems. Lenin requested the government for Russia to withdraw from the war. However, his demands are out of place. After several military setbacks, there were protests from the population. There was pressure on the government. The government responded by firing at its supporters and arresting the Bolsheviks. Lenin fled the country and spent some time in exile.
The problem of Russia in the First World War was the underdeveloped industry. Russia faces significant issues on the battlefield due to industrial backwardness. They had to seek help from France and Britain to avoid a total disaster. Russia was also experiencing economic problems, so the army had an apparent shortage of food, ammunition, medicines, and other supplies. The big question was the lack of heavy artillery that Russia began to produce on its own after the second year of the war.
This is quite a complex question. In the USA, the Constitution is not precise about the scope of powers and duties of the different layers and branches of government. It was not until the tenure of John James Marshall, a Federalist judge who served at the SCOTUS between 1801 and 1835, that this complex legal question was clarified during the Marbury v. Madison case.
This case established the principle of Judicial Review, by which the judiciary, one of the three branches of government reviews the actions and/or laws or decrees passed by the other two powers. This means that in terms of Constitutionality, the courts have jurisdiction over the other two branches of government. This is part of the system of Checks and Balances.
