1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kifflom [539]
3 years ago
13

Judging by the map, which best explains why the empire’s western half was hard to rule? The west suffered economically because i

t did not have adequate ports. The west covered a large territory and was at more risk of foreign invasion. The west had a more diverse population because it bordered three countries. The west did not have enough troops to protect its vast amount of territory. ANSWER b
History
2 answers:
tankabanditka [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is "second choice"

Explanation:

For a successful rule, the Empire of Rome was becoming too huge and the external regions do anything they want. They were trying to find a way to solve this and other issues. He concluded that breaking Europe into two parts would be the solution.  

In this question, Whenever we see the map, it explains that perhaps the west contained a vast area but was at higher risk of foreign occupation, that's why the western half of the kingdom was difficult to control.

prisoha [69]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: B on edg

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Nathanial Bacon was a(n) __________. English aristocrat who had recently migrated to Virginia free black man who led outdoor rel
morpeh [17]

Answer:

A Colonist.

Explanation:

Nathaniel Bacon was a colonist of Virginia Colony, famous as the attacker to free black man who led outdoor revivals. He propogated Bacon's Rebellion of 1676, which collapsed when Bacon himself died.

5 0
3 years ago
Which group had the most gains after the Civil War?
grin007 [14]
I think Native American farmer sorry if I’m wrong
7 0
3 years ago
What advantages did the ancient greeks had living in small communities?
KiRa [710]

Religious freedom and people worshiped in different way. The people in all the ancient Greek city states believed in the same gods and worshiped in the same way. They were not forced to believe they simply believed in them. They spoke the same language. That had a common culture their love of beauty and competition to name two. Their city states were located on the same peninsula.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
What is absolute advantage
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

<em>The ability of an individual or group to carry out a particular economic activity more efficiently than another individual or group. </em>

Explanation:

Or, an economy can produce a greater total of goods for the same quantity of inputs.

(Absolute advantage means that fewer resources are needed to produce the same amount of goods and there will be lower costs than other economies.)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help please
    14·1 answer
  • What does Jefferson say about whether the US Constitution allows for an agreement such as the Louisiana Purchase? how can you te
    5·1 answer
  • Match these leaders of World War II with their descriptions.
    9·1 answer
  • Who secured access to oil during World War I and beyond by buying a majority stake in what?
    5·2 answers
  • What did Washington’s response to the Whiskey Rebellion show about the federal government and armed rebellion?
    14·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINlIEST!
    12·1 answer
  • During the Middle Ages, how did Catholic religious leaders influence the kings and lords of Europe? A. The Church had control ov
    14·1 answer
  • In order to be a state judge, a candidate must have been born in the United States.
    14·1 answer
  • What strategy helped Native Americans keep more of their land?
    12·1 answer
  • Government in Oklahoma
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!