Answer:
The correct answer would be options A and B.
Explanation:
When a company is in financial trouble or faced a bankruptcy, then a process of reorganization is used in an attempt to extend the life of the company through some special arrangement to make the organization successful and progressive.
In this question, Jim wants to know how employees of the company think of the new structure after the reorganization. So the best method to talk to employees directly is to give them a surprise visit and talk to them about the reorganization. Also town hall meetings should be arranged to meet the employees one on one in an informal gathering and talk to them about the reorganization.
Answer: The monthly payment will be $2007.81.
We have:
Cost of the sports coupe (PV) $84,500
Annual Percentage Rate (APR) 6.6%
Loan tenure in months (n) 48
We can find the monthly payment by using the Present value of an annuity formula:
Since APR is a yearly number, we need to convert it into a monthly rate.
So , 
Plugging values in the PV formula above we get,
Answer:
$4.24287 million per year
Explanation:
Missing question: The swap will call for the exchange of 1 million euros for a given number of dollars in each year.
For structured three separate forward contracts of the exchange of currencies, the forward price could be found as follows
Forward exchange rate * $1 million error = Dollar to be received
Year 1 = 1.50*(1.04/1.03) * 1 million euros
Year 1 = 1.514563106796117 * 1 million euros
Year 1 = $1.5145 million
Year 2 = 1.50*(1.04/1.03)^2 * 1 million euros
Year 2 = 1.529267602978604 * 1 million euros
Year 2 = $1.5293 million
Year 3 = 1.50*(1.04/1.03)^3 * 1 million euros
Year 3 = $1.5441 million
The number of dollars each year is determined by computing the present value:
= 1.5145 / 1.04 + 1.5293 /(1.04)^2 +1.5441 / (1.04)^3
= 1.45625 + 1.41392 + 1.3727
= $4.24287 million per year
I will give you a link from quizlet. Just wait..
Of the following, the best criticism of the argument above is that it overlooks the possibility that certain factors operating in the 1980’s but not in the 1970’s diminished people’s incentive to save and invest.
<span>If these other factors, unrelated to the inflation rate, that operated in the 1980’s but not the 1970’s, created an even greater disincentive to savings and investment than high inflation rates provide, then those trends do not provide evidence about the general relationship among savings, investment, and inflation. </span>
