Answer:
Explanation:
<u>Each state may choose differently on whether to go to war or not.</u>
<u>There would also not be enough funding. The funding would have to come from the federal government.</u>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.
The british colonists would trade with the powhatan tribe and work together to collect crops, food, and other necessary things found in the area.
hope this helps
The main goal of the America First Committee was to "<span>(B) continue American isolationism by ending the Lend-Lease Program," since this program stood for keeping the United States out of European affairs. </span>
I think I’m agriculture but I’m not sure
