Comparing and contrasting the different Native American tribes

History

1 answer:

IgorC [24]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Iroquois and Algonquin lived in the Northeast US and southeast Canada. The Anasazi lived in the Southwest US. The Iroquois and Anasazi lived a more sedentary lifestyle, while the Algonquin lived a more nomadic lifestyle. The Algonquin hunted and fished for food, while the Iroquois and Anasazi hunted, but also grew crops. Algonquin lived in wigwams (dome-shaped homes), Iroquois lived in long houses, and the Anasazi lived in Adobe style homes called pueblos. They all used what was available in nature for the creation of their homes. Algonquin society was patriarchal, Iroquois was matriarchal, and Anasazi was more matriarchal. The Algonquin and Iroquois were actually confederacies. They were actually different tribes of native americans that banded together in times of need.

No one is sure how the Anaszi declined. Some believe that they were attacked by a more hostile group or groups of indians. Others believe that they exhausted the few natural resources that existed within their desert environment. The Algonquin and Iroquois societies still exist and thrive today. They are prominent in their ancestral lands and have played key roles within both US and Canadian governments to protect their land and interests.

You might be interested in

Which characteristic of the Vietnam War was central to changing public opinion about the war?

galben [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Well if was a few things, first was the idea of why are we fighting to protect the democracy of a country have way across the world especially when many South Vietnamese government seemed on the edge of collapse and was oppressing the Buddhist majority, then fact that we had a draft here, however politicians refused to activate the reserve and the national guard so many young people who were forced to serve were upset, then many people believed the Vietnamese people had the right to self determination.

but the many TL DR reason was just how many Americans were being killed in the pointless war and how many Americans were captured, also in 1967 and 1968 when it seemed like we couldn't win the war, and when documents were released saying that LBJ didn't think we could win either that really hurt support for the war

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best summarizes the work of the code talkers?

adelina 88 [10]

The answer is A because no one knew the Navajo language

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the causes and effects of japan growing military power?

Nataly [62]

Answer: Imperialism.

Explanation:

Japanese imperialism was most evident in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, until World War II. That was the reason the Japanese were continuously arming themselves. Japan sought to achieve its imperialist aspirations to the detriment of its neighbors, and for a long time was the most powerful factor in the Far East. By the above, Japan fought during the Second World War on the side of Germany precisely because of its efforts to implement its imperialist aspirations through war.

4 0

2 years ago

The Revolutionary war also took place at sea. Britain had a very powerful 2 points

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

a blockade

Explanation:

it is a block

8 0

2 years ago

Write the answer in your own words.

PolarNik [594]

Explanation:

with police officers they usually are a lot or in duty to make sure that everyone is safe and sound but sometimes you can go to a violent mode which they do not care and if it is for someone safety they will shoot someone. this is very important information because sometimes these people can be very innocent and they shot up very innocent person for no reason. which is why when people/ police officers shoot wrong people there's cause of war / riots. which is why police officers need to be careful on who they shoot and make sure that that is the right suspect or they can get to do a lot of deep trouble for that.

5 0

2 years ago