The South opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it would have prevented any new territories from having slavery in them.
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. The specific language of the proviso went like this:
<span><em>Provided, That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall first be duly convicted</em>.
</span>
Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The high-intensity debate over slavery and the expansion of slavery was evidenced by how things went with the "Wilmot Proviso."
It's B <span>religious differences
Hope I helped!</span>
Answer:
To exercise freedom of their Christian faith.
Explanation:
England was one of the major Europeans that seek to colonize the New World otherwise known as America. Others include Spain, France, and the Netherlands.
However, originally the purpose of each of the European settlers was different. England or English people on one hand was initially seeking "to exercise freedom of their Christian faith."
This led to two groups coming from England known as Puritans and Pilgrims that settle down in North America.
<span>Napoleon, similar to any great undemocratic and dictatorial leader wanted control over his followers s In the wake of seeing that the creatures (a few) needed the windmill, napoleon chose to offer in to their desires, to show up as the ruler who thought of the thought initially and needed the homestead to be innovatively exceptional something, he asserts, snowball did not need.
Another method for taking a gander at it is that he understood that it spoke to a few decent things for him. It was a simple method to influence other creatures to do what he needed, and gave them a remark on to keep their consideration off what he was doing, and also destroying them so that regardless of whether they desired and are going to oust him, they were excessively drained.</span>
