Answer:
The primary issue with this voting form is that the arrangement of the yes/no bolts is confounding in certain bits. The polling form, in this manner, could be indistinct for certain voters. Polling forms ought to be planned in a manner that limits disarray. They should make it simpler for the voter to communicate his conclusion. On the off chance that this doesn't occur, at that point the polling form in all probability should be amended.
Answer:
Foundations of Chinese Society that the Han dynasty brought back after unifying China:
A. the importance of the family
D. belief in Buddhism
Explanation:
The Han dynasty reigned over China between 206 BCE–220 CE. It lasted very long and recorded many achievements, including the unification of all China with neighboring kingdoms. According to history, during the Han dynasty, Buddhism flourished as it was combined with Taoism and magical practices. It started being practised in the royal court with returning monks helping to spread it. Also during the Han dynasty Confucianism came to shape Chinese society. Since Confucius, the founder of Confucianism, taught that the family was central of the well-being of the state, Han officials promoted strong family ties, and the family grew in importance in Chinese society.
Explanation:
In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?
The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.
The correct answer here is the option B.
The March on Washington occurred August in the year 1963. The purpose of this action was to gather support for the passing of the Civil Rights act. About 250.000 people were a part of the march and it was during this ceremony that Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous I Have a Dream speech .
