Answer:C
Step-by-step explanation: You want to add up all the marbles, and then take the red marbles and divide by all the marbles 7/20
x=11
x is equal to 11 because you subtract 4x from both sides and then add 8 to both sides where you are left with 2x=22. After dividing by 2, you get x=11
Answer:
-13
Step-by-step explanation:
2x²+26x+156=0
x²+13x+78=0
x²+13x=-78
x²+13x+169/4=-143/4
(x+13/2)²=-143/4
x+13/2=(i√143)/2 or x+13/2=-(i√143)/2
x=(i√143)/2-13/2 or x=-(i√143)/2-13/2
(i√143)/2-13/2+(-(i√143)/2)-13/2=(i√143-13-i√143-13)/2=-26/2=-13
Answer:
∠ ABC = 22°
Step-by-step explanation:
OA = OB ( radii of circle )
Then Δ OAB is isosceles with base angles congruent , that is
∠ OBA = ∠ OAB = 17x
The sum of the 3 angles in the triangle sum to 180°
17x + 17x + 11x = 180
45x = 180 ( divide both sides by 45 )
x = 4
Then
∠ OBA = 17x = 17(4) = 68°
BC is a tangent so ∠ OBC = 90°
∠ ABC = 90° - ∠ OBA = 90° - 68° = 22°
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.